Policy – pv magazine USA https://pv-magazine-usa.com Solar Energy Markets and Technology Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:22:08 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.3 139258053 In case you missed it: Five big solar stories in the news this week https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/28/in-case-you-missed-it-five-big-solar-stories-in-the-news-this-week-4/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/28/in-case-you-missed-it-five-big-solar-stories-in-the-news-this-week-4/#respond Fri, 28 Jun 2024 22:00:30 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105815 pv magazine USA spotlights news of the past week including market trends, project updates, policy changes and more.]]> pv magazine USA spotlights news of the past week including market trends, project updates, policy changes and more.

City of Detroit to install solar in mostly vacant neighborhoods  Three Detroit neighborhoods were chosen as sites for solar facilities. The City plans to build 33 MW of solar to power its municipal buildings.

See where solar manufacturing is planned in North America on Sinovoltaics’ Supply Chain map The up-to-date map provides details on 95 factories producing PV modules, cells, wafers, ingots, polysilicon, and metallurgical-grade silicon in Mexico, Canada, and the United States, up from 81 in the first quarter.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/28/in-case-you-missed-it-five-big-solar-stories-in-the-news-this-week-4/feed/ 0 105815
Roadmap to designing an efficient community solar program https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/28/roadmap-to-designing-an-efficient-community-solar-program/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/28/roadmap-to-designing-an-efficient-community-solar-program/#respond Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:58:48 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105801 The Coalition for Community Solar Access released a Policy Roadmap that offers legislative guidance including model legislation.

The Coalition for Community Solar Access (CCSA) released its Policy Roadmap that includes a guidebook, model legislation, inclusive solar access solutions for low-to-moderate income subscribers and consumer protection best practices. It’s intended to serve as a blueprint for states without competitive community solar programs to pass legislation that supports programs. It also provides insight into how to maximize federal funding.

“Our Roadmap boils down nearly a decade of the best lessons we’ve learned from creating community solar markets across the country into a succinct set of documents,” says Molly Knoll, Vice President of Policy, CCSA. “With many states exploring the development of new, or revamped, community solar programming and federal funds ready to deploy, this felt like the perfect time to release this helpful guide for all our advocates.”

The community solar is on the rise as it brings economic and social benefits to all Americans seeking local, clean community solar energy. By its design it lets people benefit from solar energy who may be unable to install solar either due to financial restrictions or because they do not have a suitable rooftop for solar.

Wood Mackenzie expects 7.6 GW of new community solar will come online in existing state markets between 2024 and 2028, and the national total of community solar installations is expected to pass 10 GW of cumulative capacity in 2026.

Source: Wood Mackenzie

The CCSA’s aim with the Roadmap is to help the industry continue on the upward trajectory it’s currently experiencing, which requires strong programmatic and policy decisions.

The Roadmap’s release coincides with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is set to deploy $7 billion to state applicants through its Solar for All program, a funding opportunity that has a goal of bringing solar energy to low-income households. Recipients were chosen based on their proposals to develop programs designed to serve communities facing barriers to distributed solar deployment, with 100% of funding supporting low-income and disadvantaged communities in all 50 states the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and territories.

Supporting low-income households

As recently shown in community solar programs and research reports from Wood Mackenzie and the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab  (LBNL) community solar has effectively expanded solar access to multifamily housing occupants, renters and low-income households. Based on a sample of 11 states, the LBNL study found that community solar adopters in 2023 were about 6.1 times more likely to live in multifamily buildings than rooftop solar adopters, 4.4 times more likely to rent, and earned 23% less annual income.

“The data speaks for itself: when states implement thoughtful policy programs that simplify income verification, billing, and expand access, we see immense growth in community solar adoption by low-to-moderate income households,” said Stephanie Burgos-Veras, senior manager of equity programs, CCSA. “We hope our Policy Solutions for Inclusive Solar Access primer can lead to more community solar programming being implemented — so that ultimately, more LMI households can benefit.”

The new CCSA Roadmap is intended to be used in conjunction with a companion document that provides Model Legislation for Community Solar Programs, that serves as a toolkit for policymakers to draft effective and sustainable community solar policies. The toolkit helps them tailor the program to community residents; kickstart the market with bill credit structure, oversight and administration; ensure long-term success by integrating community solar programs into existing utility and energy infrastructure of a state.

Also covered are potential challenges, the role of utilities, interconnection issues, program size and more. It also offers strategies to ensure that programs exist long into the future and continue to serve local residents.

Community solar legislation has been adopted in 19 states and the District of Columbia and multiple states have legislation in the works with nearly a dozen considering laws to create programs. Combined with the Solar For All program, CCSA believes that now is the time for policymakers to revisit the idea of bringing community solar to their state.

Find all the documents in the Policy Roadmap here under the “CCSA & Other Resources” tab.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/28/roadmap-to-designing-an-efficient-community-solar-program/feed/ 0 105801
Recurrent Energy transfers $103 million in tax credits for Oklahoma project https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/27/recurrent-energy-transfers-103-million-in-tax-credits-for-oklahoma-project/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/27/recurrent-energy-transfers-103-million-in-tax-credits-for-oklahoma-project/#respond Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:24:45 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105766 The owner and operator of the 160 MW North Fork Solar project signed the tax credit facilitation agreement with Bank of America.

Recurrent Energy, a subsidiary of Canadian Solar, signed a $103 million tax credit facilitation agreement with Bank of America for its North Fork Solar Project.

The tax equity agreement is Recurrent Energy’s first production tax credit (PTC) transaction and first tax credit transfer transaction. Recurrent reports that by transferring tax credits to Bank of America, it can access funding more quickly and efficiently.

In April the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released final guidance for the transfer of clean energy tax credits, a provision within the Inflation Reduction Act and the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors (CHIPS) act that allow tax credit owners to sell their credits to other entities with a tax appetite.

Under a tax credit transfer transaction, renewable energy developers and owners can sell tax credits for cash, making financing easier for new clean energy projects. The transferability option is generally open to the entities that are not covered by the direct pay option. More information in the frequently asked questions section can be found here.

Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority (OMPA), which serves 42 municipally owned electric systems in Oklahoma, will purchase 100% of the energy produced by North Fork Solar under a 15-year agreement. This marks the first solar project in OMPA’s energy mix. Recurrent Energy will continue to own and operate the project long-term.

“This addition will further diversify our energy sources and provide our member cities with more energy options to offer their customers,” said David Osburn, OMPA general manager. “We look forward to maintaining a long-term relationship with Recurrent Energy.”

The 120 MWac North Fork Solar project, which sits on 1,012 acres in Kiowa County, Oklahoma, will provide enough electricity to power the equivalent of 35,000 homes year.

This project greatly increases the amount of solar installed in the state of Oklahoma, which ranked 46th for installed capacity in Q1 2024 with 189 MW, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association. At that time the Covington Solar Farm at 13.2 MW, which came online in 2017, was a landmark project.

Construction by Blattner began in August 2023 and was compete in June  2024 with approximately 250 people employed during peak construction and three permanent jobs during operation.

According to Recurrent Energy’s website, the project used construction methods to minimize grading and removal of soil, and preserved topsoil was redistributed across the graded areas to assist in growing ground cover as quickly as possible.

Recurrent Energy reports that during the project’s development and construction, the company supported local initiatives, including the Snyder 4-H and FFA, Snyder Prom, and Cyclone Educational Foundation. Now that it’s operational, the solar project will contribute about $26 million to community services.

Recurrent Energy began developing North Fork Solar in 2018. NordLB and Rabobank provided project financing for North Fork Solar. CRC-IB and Latham & Watkins advised Recurrent Energy on the tax credit transfer transaction.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/27/recurrent-energy-transfers-103-million-in-tax-credits-for-oklahoma-project/feed/ 0 105766
Sunrise brief: Solar tax transfer for smaller projects–Dissecting a $600,000 tax credit transaction https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/26/sunrise-brief-7/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/26/sunrise-brief-7/#respond Wed, 26 Jun 2024 12:00:45 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105645 Also on the rise: Meyer Burger set to begin production at U.S. module factory. City of Detroit to install solar in mostly vacant neighborhoods. And more.

Meyer Burger set to begin production at U.S. module factory The relocation of the photovoltaic manufacturer’s core business from Germany to the USA is taking shape. Production of heterojunction solar modules is starting and financing for a new cell plant is progressing.

Solar tax transfer for smaller projects: Dissecting a $600,000 tax credit transaction Basis Climate has closed its smallest IRA transferable tax credit deal to date,  marking the end of an era dominated by million-dollar minimum tax credit transactions.

Origami Solar sets up regional fabrication of steel solar panel frames Partnerships with steel equipment producers in Ohio and two locations in Texas will enable Origami to have its steel solar module frames shipped from fabricator to module manufacturer in one to two days, the company says.

‘Module prices surprisingly keep going down’ As part of our Intersolar 2024 interview series, pv magazine spoke with Yana Hryshko, head of Solar Supply Chain Research for Wood Mackenzie, about overcapacity, declining panel prices and expected PV demand for the next years. She revealed that Chinese module procurement schemes are currently seeing unprecedented, “ridiculously” low bids, but she also noted that the $0.08/W threshold may now be difficult to exceed. Hryshko also expects many manufacturers to backpedal on previously announced capacity expansion plans and renegotiate module supply contracts.

Cultural considerations for international solar expansion Each region has a different way of doing things, whether it’s selecting sites, managing employees, or implementing manufacturing standards. Companies looking to expand into foreign markets need to be prepared to deal with these cultural differences, says Clean Energy Associates (CEA) Vice President Mark Hagedorn.

City of Detroit to install solar in mostly vacant neighborhoods Three Detroit neighborhoods were chosen as sites for solar facilities. The City plans to build 33 MW of solar to power its municipal buildings.

‘We expect solar panel prices to stabilize in the second half of the year’ At Intersolar Europe 2024, pv magazine spoke with Edurne Zoco, executive director, Clean Energy Technology at S&P Global Commodity Insights, about module price trends, increasing solar demand and PV manufacturing outside China. She claims panel prices may stabilize in the second half of this year or in early 2025 and says top seven Chinese manufacturers may even continue with capacity expansion plans. She also believes that, without further substantial incentives, Europe will not be able to recreate a domestic PV supply chain.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/26/sunrise-brief-7/feed/ 0 105645
Solar tax transfer for smaller projects: Dissecting a $600,000 tax credit transaction https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/25/solar-tax-transfer-for-smaller-projects-dissecting-a-600000-tax-credit-transaction/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/25/solar-tax-transfer-for-smaller-projects-dissecting-a-600000-tax-credit-transaction/#respond Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:43:01 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105654 Basis Climate has closed its smallest IRA transferable tax credit deal to date, marking the end of an era dominated by million-dollar minimum tax credit transactions.

Basis Climate has delivered an investment tax credit (ITC) transfer worth $600,000 for a 1.2 MW solar project, complete with a twelve-page transfer agreement plus requisite due diligence documentation. This transaction, facilitated under the new provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), signals a significant shift in the tax credit landscape, expanding access to smaller-scale solar projects.

Tax equity, a financing arrangement where investors fund solar power projects in exchange for federal tax benefits like investment tax credits, is a complex field that integrates capital and labor. Initial costs for assembling these deals can start under $100,000 but may quickly escalate to millions. These expenses, covering fees for lawyers, accountants, and engineers, support extensive review of data rooms and the drafting of extensive contracts, focusing on compliance and diligence. The objective is to ensure that large investment groups can safely deploy billions of dollars in compliance with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service regulations.

The introduction of the IRA brings about ITC transferability. This mechanism provides a less formal alternative to traditional tax equity, facilitating the use of solar ITCs by investors.

When pv magazine USA consulted tax equity professionals, now also working with transfers, at the Solar Energy Industries Association’s annual Finance, Tax, and Buyer’s Seminar in March about the potential for simpler “six- to eight-page” tax transfer contracts, their response was a mix of skepticism and amusement. Such brief documents would stand in stark contrast to the extensive documentation required for solar tax equity transactions due to their complexity and regulatory demands. Our sources indicate that shorter contract lengths would align better with those used in the movie industry, which also navigates its own tax credit processes.

In the past, even the smallest projects that attracted tax equity investors required $1 to $2 million in tax benefits to offset the $75,000 in fees. That landscape is now evolving.

Source: Basis Climate’s online portal

Basis Climate, an internet-based tax credit transfer platform, has closed nearly $250 million in deals and boasts a $2 billion pipeline across various technologies, including solar, energy storage, renewable natural gas, wind, and electric vehicle charging. Over the past month, the company has managed over $50 million in term sheets and offers, with more than $70 million in signed deals progressing towards closure.

WeWould Solar, a single-purpose entity providing ancillary power to on-site agricultural processing in Gainesville, Florida, partnered with Basis Climate on the $600,000 ITC sale. The project is for a net-metered, behind-the-meter solar power initiative within the utility region managed by the Clay Electric Cooperative. The transaction took place through Basis Climate’s website, with the ITC being acquired by Creditable Capital.

Derek Silverman, co-founder & chief product officer at Basis Climate, shared insights with pv magazine USA.

The project is slated for development in three phases, each anticipated to be 1.2 MW. Notably, since the initial phase was under 1 MWac, it was exempt from prevailing wage or apprenticeship requirements. The installation will use SMA Sunny High Power PEAK3 inverters, Canadian Solar bifacial BiHiKu 425 W modules, and TerraSmart’s Glade Wave racking.

Source: WeWouldSolar energy monitoring dashboard

Creditable has disclosed that it is underwriting ITC transfer transactions targeting a 10% to 15% return on investment, net of fees and expenses, for its investors. For a $600,000 transaction, with limited information available, a return in this range suggests that Creditable Capital paid approximately 85 to 87 cents on the dollar. This payment rate is at the lower end of the typical industry range, where 90 to 95 cents on the dollar is common for larger solar power projects involving investment-grade asset owners and sophisticated development and construction firms.

First Solar, meanwhile, received 97 cents on the dollar when it sold its manufacturing tax credits.

Risk management

Silverman highlighted that the project’s diligence covered approximately 20 key areas, including organizational documents, project design, construction plans, operational strategies, insurance placement, and project valuation and qualification. Finalizing these core areas early helped Creditable Capital concentrate on higher-risk aspects, such as determining the project’s eligible basis and mitigating recapture risks, which involve the risk of having to return tax benefits if the project fails to comply with regulatory requirements.

For projects where asset owners lack strong financial foundations, buyers commonly secure tax insurance to safeguard against recapture risk. This insurance also provides a financial safety net, known as a backstop indemnity, in case the project’s liabilities exceed its assets. In the case of Creditable, the financial guarantees provided by the asset owner were sufficient, eliminating the need for tax insurance. However, when sellers lack a robust balance sheet, buyers generally obtain tax insurance to ensure comprehensive protection.

Adam Stern, founding partner of Creditable Capital, commented on their funding strategy, stating:

Creditable is getting more comfortable with the funding at a point in time after diligence is completed with a holdback for the IRS registration. Creditable, through its investors and financial institution relationships, is working to provide bridge loans on projects that it is buying the credits for.

A lingering risk in these transactions is how the IRS will require buyers and sellers to verify aspects of the deal, such as the determination of the basis.

Determining the appropriate ITC is a complex process due to the US Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) detailed and evolving definitions of what constitutes an eligible project ‘basis’. For example, essential infrastructure like fences and roads, required by code for project deployment, are not considered part of the eligible basis, thus not qualifying for the 30% ITC. Similarly, interconnection costs had been excluded until recent changes under the IRA, which now allows projects under 5 MWac to include these costs in their ITC calculations.

In the traditional tax equity market, buyers of ITC needed to demonstrate significant involvement in the solar projects, taking on considerable operational and developmental risks, and ensuring long-term revenue from the projects flowed to them through complex financing arrangements. Some of requirements have been relaxed, although thorough due diligence and responsible investment practices remain essential.

A community solar project developed by Wunder Power in Maryland, part of an ITC sale facilitated by Basis in 2023. Image: Basis Climate.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/25/solar-tax-transfer-for-smaller-projects-dissecting-a-600000-tax-credit-transaction/feed/ 0 105654
Sunrise brief: New platform vets residential solar salespeople https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/25/sunrise-brief-new-platform-vets-residential-solar-salespeople/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/25/sunrise-brief-new-platform-vets-residential-solar-salespeople/#respond Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:00:05 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105588 Also on the rise: Siting solar projects for best environmental results. Top solar panel brands in reliability, quality, and performance. And more.

Maine may design a distribution system operator to advance distributed energy resources Maine has hired a consulting firm to evaluate whether forming a distribution system operator could speed deployment of distributed energy resources and support other state goals. Consultants are reviewing how the approach is used in five other countries.

New platform vets residential solar salespeople An industry plagued by deceptive practices is now verifying salespeople via a platform called Recheck.

Summit Ridge to procure 800 MW of Qcells solar panels The recent agreement brings the total to 2 GW of solar modules that the community solar specialist will purchase from Qcells, mostly manufactured in its facility in Georgia.

More solar installations coming to U.S. military bases In a partnership with Duke Energy valued at an estimated $248 million, the U.S. Department of Defense will be the exclusive purchaser of all output generated by two new solar facilities, which will serve five military bases.

Siting solar projects for best environmental results A new white paper from Clearloop identifies key U.S. regions for best carbon displacement impact of new clean energy projects.

Top solar panel brands in reliability, quality, and performance Solar modules are evaluated in the Renewable Energy Test Center annual PV Module Index.

pv magazine interview: ‘In the next year, some of these guys are going to be bankrupt’ At Intersolar in Munich, pv magazine spoke with Jenny Chase, solar analyst at BloombergNEF, about the incredibly low polysilicon prices, massive overcapacity, and increasing consolidation. According to Chase, this year there will be enough polysilicon capacity to produce 1.1 TW of solar modules, but global module demand is expected to reach around 585 GW. 

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/25/sunrise-brief-new-platform-vets-residential-solar-salespeople/feed/ 0 105588
Siting solar projects for best environmental results https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/24/carbon-displacement-impact-of-new-clean-energy-projects-varies-widely-by-location/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/24/carbon-displacement-impact-of-new-clean-energy-projects-varies-widely-by-location/#respond Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:46:17 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105621 A new white paper from Clearloop identifies key U.S. regions for best carbon displacement impact of new clean energy projects.

A recent report by Tennessee-based carbon solutions platform Clearloop noted that private companies have contracted for 71 GW of new renewable energy capacity in the U.S. since 2014, which is enough electricity to power nearly 15 million homes. However, the distribution of solar and wind projects tends to cluster regionally, and not only because of the availability of wind and solar resources. State and utility renewable energy policies play a huge role in where new projects are sited.

Clearloop, which is a subsidiary of solar power producer Silicon Ranch, partnered with non-profit emissions data analysis firm WattTime to study how renewable energy projects – and solar in particular – could be sited to produce better environmental and even social outcomes. The resulting white paper, Curing Carbon Blindness, reinforces the important role of private sector action in growing renewable energy in the U.S. while at the same time saying such action can be better focused to achieve decarbonization goals.

By incorporating the principle of “emmissionality,” the report suggests, companies looking to purchase renewable energy credits (RECs) or offset to their carbon footprints should seek to contract with solar and wind projects in regions with the highest percentage of fossil fuel generation.

Under the current structure, all RECs are essentially created equal, meaning an offtaker in one part of the country can buy RECs from a project anywhere else. There are differences in regional markets, such as ERCOT, but this is generally how it works. Laura Zapata, co-founder and CEO of Clearloop and one of the authors of the carbon blindness report, said not all MWh of clean energy are created equal in terms of their environmental impact.

“We still get over 60% of our electricity in this country from fossil fuels,” Zapata told pv magazine USA. “And so, our goal is how do we build more solar projects in the most carbon intense communities, which also happen to be often the most underserved and disadvantaged communities.”

Unlike most countries, the U.S. does not have a single national energy grid. It is more like a continent with many regional grids of widely varying emissions characteristics. Some regions, such as California, have grids with high percentages of renewables, while others, such as in the southern Appalachians, have fossil-fuel-heavy generation.

 

There are great disparities in the percentage of fossil-fuel generation (top) and renewable-energy generation (bottom) across the United States. New solar projects in carbon intensive areas have more beneficial environmental effects.

According to the Clearloop report, turning on a light switch in eastern Kentucky will result in 54% more carbon emissions than turning on a corresponding light in Los Angeles. This same data show that a new solar plant located in eastern Kentucky will reduce emissions by 62% more than the same plant would in Los Angeles.

By combining historical irradiance data with WattTime’s marginal emissions data, Clearloop says it is able to model not only how much electricity a solar project is expected to supply the grid, but also the marginal carbon intensity of the power generation sources it is displacing in that region at specific times.

Zapata argues that the marginal difference in emissions that results when solar generation displaces fossil fuel generation should be a key factor in citing projects. Using WattTime’s emissions analysis methodology, Clearloop had identified the regions of the U.S. where new solar, the report’s main focus, would have the greatest decarbonization impact by reducing a like amount of fossil fuel generation sources.

The analysis also extends to voluntary carbon offset markets that rely on private carbon credit registries, such as Verra or Gold Standard. This enables a company to use the methodology for contracting with solar projects to offset its carbon footprint from activities other than electricity consumption, such as air travel.

“Our clients are not interested in the electricity,” Zapata said. “What they want is credit for the environmental impact of those electrons flowing into the grid. So, whether they count them as RECs or offsets, we’re sort of agnostic.”

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/24/carbon-displacement-impact-of-new-clean-energy-projects-varies-widely-by-location/feed/ 0 105621
More solar installations coming to U.S. military bases https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/24/more-solar-installations-coming-to-u-s-military-bases/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/24/more-solar-installations-coming-to-u-s-military-bases/#respond Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:02:53 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105611 In a partnership with Duke Energy valued at an estimated $248 million, the U.S. Department of Defense will be the exclusive purchaser of all output generated by two new solar facilities, which will serve five military bases.

With more than 300,000 buildings and 600,000 vehicles, the U.S. Government is the nation’s largest energy consumer. As a part of the Federal Sustainability Plan that directs the Government to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, the Government is quickly ramping up use of solar energy at military bases, five of which will soon be drawing electricity from two solar installations in South Carolina.

In a partnership with Duke Energy valued at an estimated $248 million, the Department of Defense (DOD) will be the exclusive purchaser of all output generated by two new solar facilities. The five military installations across North Carolina and South Carolina to benefit from the clean energy include Fort Liberty, USMC-Camp Lejeune, USMC-Cherry Point, USAF Seymour Johnson and USAF Shaw.

“DoD is leading by example on climate change in ways that will spur new clean electricity production, create good-paying jobs, increase our resilience to climate change, and enhance our national security,” said Andrew Mayock, Federal Chief Sustainability Officer at the White House Council on Environmental Quality.

Duke Energy estimates that it will provide 135 MW and approximately 4.8 million MW-hours of renewable energy in both states over a 15-year delivery period. According to the DoD, these installations will achieve 75% of their 2030 carbon-free energy requirement. Fort Liberty, for example, will reduce its emissions from electricity by 27% compared to 2022, with cost savings possible by 2040. The two solar facilities, which are expected to become operational in 2026, will be developed, owned and operated by energyRe, according to Duke.

“This project is a great opportunity to assist our military departments and our warfighters in their decarbonization goals and is paramount to reaching our initial goals of Executive Order 14057, Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs Through Federal Sustainability. DLA Energy is committed to supporting the administration’s clean energy initiatives and helping the military services and whole-of-government partners achieve their climate change goals,” said United States Air Force Col. Jennifer Neris, director of carbon pollution-free electricity for the Defense Logistics Agency.

Duke Energy reports that it currently owns, operates and purchases more than 5,100 MW of solar power on its energy grid in the Carolinas or enough to power nearly 1 million homes annually. North Carolina currently ranks No. 5 in the nation for overall solar power. With a portfolio of nuclear, hydro and renewable energy, the utility says more than half of its energy mix in North Carolina is carbon-free.

The DoD said in a statement that it will continue to seek partnership opportunities that enable the agency and other Federal partners to achieve President Biden’s carbon-free energy goals and build a robust, clean, and domestically based electricity supply chain by 2030.

“Our partnerships with utility companies are essential to delivering energy resilience for the Army,” said Rachel Jacobson, assistant secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy, and Environment. “These partnerships are helping us put microgrids with carbon-free energy generation and storage on our installations. And our continuing collaboration with Duke Energy allows the Army to contribute to a more reliable commercial grid that strengthens the resilience of the defense communities where our soldiers, military families, and civilians live. I am proud of these partnerships and look forward to expanding them so that our installations always have access to the electricity we need to defend the nation.”

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/24/more-solar-installations-coming-to-u-s-military-bases/feed/ 0 105611
Summit Ridge to procure 800 MW of Qcells solar panels https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/24/summit-ridge-to-procure-800-mw-of-qcells-solar-panels/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/24/summit-ridge-to-procure-800-mw-of-qcells-solar-panels/#respond Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:40:24 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105593 The recent agreement brings the total to 2 GW of solar modules that the community solar specialist will purchase from Qcells, mostly manufactured in its facility in Georgia.

Summit Ridge Energy expanded its partnership with Qcells with an agreement to purchase 800 MW of solar panels.

The agreement builds on an existing 1.2 GW relationship between Qcells and Summit Ridge, announced in April of 2023 by Vice President Kamala Harris. At the time the 1.2 GW order was the largest equipment purchase in history for the community solar market.

By increasing the total commitment to 2 GW, Summit Ridge reports it will develop more than 100 additional community solar projects across the country using U.S.-made solar.

Last year Qcells announced what was then the largest investment in U.S. solar manufacturing history, investing more than $2.5  billion to build a complete solar supply chain in the United States. This made the Korean company, a subsidiary of Hanwha Solutions, the first company to establish a fully-integrated silicon-based solar supply chain in the U.S. When complete, Qcells solar panels — from polysilicon to the finished panel — will be entirely made in the U.S.

Both the build-out of Qcells U.S. manufacturing footprint and the growth of Summit Ridge Energy are incentivized by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The includes tax incentives for domestic energy production as well as manufacturing. Many of Summit Ridge’s solar projects also qualify for IRA tax credits that will provide thousands of low-income households with greater access to clean energy savings.

“We are excited to expand our partnership with Qcells, which enables Summit Ridge to deliver on our promise of giving more Americans the opportunity to power their homes and businesses with locally generated clean energy,” said Brian Dunn, chief operating officer of Summit Ridge Energy. “Through our Qcells partnership, we are able to support domestic manufacturing and job creation, while simultaneously bringing low-cost clean energy to communities that have historically been left out of the clean energy transition.”

Summit Ridge’s planned fleet of community solar farms are expected to generate enough clean energy to power an estimated 200,000 homes and businesses. Since launching in 2017, the company reports that it has deployed over $2.6 billion into clean energy assets and controls a development pipeline of more than 3 GW that will provide solar power to homes and businesses nationwide.

“Expanding this relationship with Summit Ridge Energy means more communities will have access to the most affordable energy resource in the world,” said Justin Lee, CEO of Qcells. “This partnership not only supports the domestic manufacturing industry and thousands of jobs in solar, but it also ensures more people – especially those who have historically been left out – benefit from everything the clean energy economy has to offer.”

The majority of the solar panels purchased by Summit Ridge will be produced in Qcells’ new U.S. manufacturing facility located in Georgia. Additionally, Qcells will continue to provide Summit Ridge with battery storage and software solutions under separate procurement agreements.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/24/summit-ridge-to-procure-800-mw-of-qcells-solar-panels/feed/ 0 105593
Sunrise brief: New York policy authorizes $814.6 million to fund energy storage https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/24/sunrise-brief-new-york-policy-authorizes-814-6-million-to-fund-energy-storage/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/24/sunrise-brief-new-york-policy-authorizes-814-6-million-to-fund-energy-storage/#respond Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:20:30 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105543 Also on the rise: A look at the prevailing wage and apprenticeship final rule. Spontaneous glass breakage on solar panels on the rise. And more.

New York policy authorizes $814.6 million to fund energy storage The new order puts the state on track to install 6 GW of energy storage by 2030.

Utility-scale solar development: Good planning makes good neighbors A recent study by Berkeley Lab, the University of Michigan, and Michigan State University found that sharing plans for large-scale solar projects with local residents improves the perception of such sites.

GCL says perovskite solar module passes silicon degradation tests At Intersolar Europe, the Chinese manufacturer said the perovskite-silicon tandem module would cost 50% of a crystalline silicon module that costs $0.15 per W, meaning $0.075 per W.

A look at the prevailing wage and apprenticeship final rule Taxpayers seeking to claim the highest available investment and/or production tax credits for renewable energy projects must comply with the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements.

Spontaneous glass breakage on solar panels on the rise The National Renewable Energy Laboratory noted an increase in spontaneous glass breakage in solar panels. The PV Module Index from the Renewable Energy Test Center investigates this and other glass-related trends in solar manufacturing.

In case you missed it: Five big solar stories in the news this week  pv magazine USA spotlights news of the past week including market trends, project updates, policy changes and more.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/24/sunrise-brief-new-york-policy-authorizes-814-6-million-to-fund-energy-storage/feed/ 0 105543
In case you missed it: Five big solar stories in the news this week https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/21/in-case-you-missed-it-five-big-solar-stories-in-the-news-this-week-3/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/21/in-case-you-missed-it-five-big-solar-stories-in-the-news-this-week-3/#respond Fri, 21 Jun 2024 22:00:25 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105359 pv magazine USA spotlights news of the past week including market trends, project updates, policy changes and more.]]> pv magazine USA spotlights news of the past week including market trends, project updates, policy changes and more.

Nextracker has acquired foundation specialist Ojjo in an all-cash transaction for approximately $119 million  Ojjo is a California-based renewable energy company specializing in unique truss systems that uses half the steel of a conventional foundation and a design that reportedly minimizes grading requirements in utility-scale projects.

Arizona’s largest energy storage project closes $513 million in financing The 1,200 MWh Papago Storage project will dispatch enough power to serve 244,000 homes for four hours a day with the e-Storage SolBank high-cycle lithium-ferro-phosphate battery energy storage solution.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/21/in-case-you-missed-it-five-big-solar-stories-in-the-news-this-week-3/feed/ 0 105359
A look at the prevailing wage and apprenticeship final rule https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/21/a-look-at-the-prevailing-wage-and-apprenticeship-final-rule/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/21/a-look-at-the-prevailing-wage-and-apprenticeship-final-rule/#respond Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:00:12 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105549 Taxpayers seeking to claim the highest available investment and/or production tax credits for renewable energy projects must comply with the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements.

Nearly two years following passage of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), Treasury and the IRS released the unpublished version of the final rule (Final Rule) for compliance with the IRA’s prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements (PWA requirements).

Taxpayers seeking to claim the highest available investment and/or production tax credits for renewable energy projects must comply with the PWA requirements. A taxpayer must ensure that laborers or mechanics employed by the taxpayer or any contractor or subcontractor in the construction, alteration, or repair of a qualifying facility comply with the PWA requirements.

The Final Rule concludes the federal rulemaking process for the PWA requirements. (Note: The Final Rule is scheduled to be officially published on June 25, 2024, and therefore this article relies on the unpublished version.)

The Final Rule will replace the previously-issued Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (released August 30, 2023) (NOPR), which replaced the Initial Guidance (released November 30, 2022). Overall, the Final Rule is generally consistent with the NOPR, providing helpful clarification on industry concerns raised in comments to the NOPR. However, the Final Rule expressly declines to address industry-specific concerns, emphasizing that determinations of compliance with PWA requirements will be made based upon specific facts and circumstances. It therefore leaves several questions open to interpretation, including whether commissioning work is subject to PWA requirements and to what extent certain post-operational work may be subject to PWA requirements.

Clarifications

First, with respect to when PWA requirements apply, the Final Rule provides two useful clarifications:

Its supplementary information notes that “unrelated third party manufacturers who produce materials, supplies, equipment, and prefabricated components for multiple customers or the general public” are not subject to PWA requirements. In other words, most suppliers (absent performance of construction, alteration or repair on a project site) will not be subject to PWA requirements.

It also clarifies that apprenticeship requirements only apply to the construction of a qualified facility, and do not apply to alteration or repair of a facility after the facility is placed in service. In other words, most operations and maintenance vendors will not be subject to apprenticeship requirements.

Second, with respect to payment of prevailing wages, the Final Rule outlines regulations consistent with the NOPR: A taxpayer must ensure that laborers or mechanics employed by the taxpayer or any contractor or subcontractor in the construction, alteration, or repair of the facility are paid prevailing wages for the specific type of construction in the geographic area where the facility is located. The definitions of “laborers and mechanics” and “construction, alteration or repair” provided in the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. § 3141 et. seq.) apply to the PWA requirements. General wage determinations issued by the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division on www.sam.gov provide the appropriate prevailing wages for PWA requirements. The Final Rule lists Form WH-347 (the Davis-Bacon form for certified payroll) as one example of a record that may demonstrate compliance with PWA requirements.

Notably, however, the Final Rule distinguishes prevailing wage requirements from Davis-Bacon Act requirements – noting that prevailing wage requirements pursuant to the IRA are not a mirror of the Davis-Bacon Act, but instead may be merely in harmony with Davis-Bacon requirements. Treasury and the IRS therefore declined to implement certified weekly payroll, public notice, and other Davis-Bacon Act requirements as part of the PWA requirements.

While the Davis-Bacon Act focuses on the “site of the work” to determine when prevailing wages must be paid, the Final Rule uses a similar concept of “the locality in which a facility is located.” The locality in which a facility is located is the physical place or places where the facility will be placed in service and remain – commonly understood as the project site. It also includes secondary locations where a significant portion of the facility is constructed, altered, or repaired – but excludes secondary locations for fabrication or manufacturing that are not established specifically or dedicated exclusively for a specific period of time to the facility.

Significantly, the Final Rule largely resolves the question of which prevailing wage applies to a facility. It confirms that the prevailing wage in effect at the time the agreement for construction, alteration or repair of the facility is executed is the wage that applies for purposes of the PWA requirements. The same wage general wage determination may still be used if the contractor is given additional time to complete its original commitment or if additional work is incorporated into the agreement that is “merely incidental,” which provides reassurance with respect to usual course of business change orders during construction of a facility. If, however, the agreement is modified to include “additional substantial construction, alteration or repair work not within the scope of the work of the original contract,” or if the agreement is modified to “required work to be performed for an additional time period not originally obligated,” including exercise of an option to extend the terms of an agreement, a new general wage determination will be required.

For wage determinations needed and not covered by a general wage determination, the Final Rule generally follows the NOPR’s outline for submission of supplemental wage determination requests to the Wage and Hour Division. The Final Rule notes that taxpayers, contractors or subcontractors may submit supplemental wage determination requests. Such requests should be submitted no more than 90 days before the expected execution of a construction contract (or at any time following execution), and will remain effective for 180 calendar days after they are issued (or for the duration of the time the supplemental wage determination is incorporated into the contract).

The Final Rule also provides that the Wage and Hour Division will resolve supplemental wage determination requests, or notify the requester that additional time is necessary, within 30 days of submission of a request. If a supplemental wage determination is issued after construction work has started on the facility, it applies retroactively to the date construction started.

Third, with respect to apprenticeship requirements, the Final Rule incorporates many proposed regulations from the NOPR, including the three-pronged approach necessary to comply: taxpayers must ensure the labor hour requirement, the ratio requirement, and the participation requirement are each satisfied.

Many of the ambiguities raised in comments to the NOPR regarding apprenticeship focused on the Good Faith Effort Exception, and the Final Rule addresses several of them. Requests made to registered apprenticeship programs must be made in writing and sent electronically or by registered mail. Initial requests must be made no later than 45 days before the qualified apprentices are requested to start work, and subsequent requests must be made no later than 14 days before the qualified apprentices are requested to start work. The content of each request remains as outlined in the NOPR.

The Final Rule extends the period between requests on which a taxpayer may rely on the Good Faith Effort Exception to a full calendar year. In the event a request to a registered apprenticeship program is either denied or not responded to, a taxpayer will need to ensure an additional request is submitted annually in order to rely on the Good Faith Effort Exemption. There is no limit on the number of requests that may be submitted to a program, and there is no requirement to make subsequent requests to the same program (or to follow up on requests that are not responded to).

If a request to a registered apprenticeship program is partially denied, in order to satisfy the Good Faith Effort Exception requirements, the requesting party must accept the qualified apprentices offered (and may then consider the remaining portion as labor hours performed by qualified apprentices). An employer-sponsored registered apprenticeship program may not be used by such employer to satisfy the Good Faith Effort Exception requirements, unless the employer submits compliant requests to at least one registered apprenticeship program that it does not sponsor.

Finally, the Final Rule outlines in a separate recordkeeping section a list of records that may be sufficient to demonstrate compliance with PWA requirements. It notes that taxpayers may satisfy such recordkeeping requirements by collecting and physically retaining the records; providing them to a third-party vendor; or having each party physically retain relevant records (unredacted copies of which must be made available to the IRS upon request).

It confirms again that taxpayers are entitled to a rebuttable presumption of no intentional disregard if a taxpayer makes the appropriate correction and penalty payments before receiving notice of an examination from the IRS with respect to a claim for the increased credit. While continuing to emphasize that findings of “intentional disregard” of the PWA requirements will be made based on specific facts and circumstances, the Final Rule also provides 15 examples (for prevailing wage compliance) and 13 examples (for apprenticeship compliance) of facts and circumstances that may be considered in such a finding, including whether the failure was a pattern of conduct, whether the taxpayer took reasonable steps to monitor, review and correct compliance efforts, whether the taxpayer incorporated provisions in its agreements requiring compliance with the PWA requirements, and what documentation and records the taxpayer collected to ensure such compliance.

The Final Rule also establishes a 180-day limit for the taxpayer to pay correction and penalty payments following a final determination from the IRS that the taxpayer has failed to satisfy PWA requirements.

Overall, the Final Rule provides helpful clarity to renewable energy developers and contractors enacting and enforcing PWA requirements throughout the industry. However, leaves open industry-specific questions such as what scope of work constitutes “repair” rather than “maintenance,” particularly during operation of a facility. It also fails to address whether on-site commissioning work constitutes “construction, alteration or repair” sufficient to trigger obligations to comply with PWA requirements. These questions will remain subject to assessment based on specific facts and circumstances, and prudent industry developers and contractors will need to carefully consider and document how they approach compliance with PWA requirements consistent with prudent industry practices.

Monica Dozier and Jennifer Trulock are partners at Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP and regularly advise clients on labor and employment issues in the renewable energy industry.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/21/a-look-at-the-prevailing-wage-and-apprenticeship-final-rule/feed/ 0 105549
New York policy authorizes $814.6 million to fund energy storage https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/21/new-york-policy-authorizes-814-6-million-to-fund-energy-storage/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/21/new-york-policy-authorizes-814-6-million-to-fund-energy-storage/#respond Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:54:37 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105524 The new order puts the state on track to install 6 GW of energy storage by 2030.

The New York State Public Service Commission approved a new framework for New York to achieve 6 GW of energy storage by 2030, representing at least 20% of the peak electricity load of New York State.

The original Energy Storage Order was developed in 2018 and had a target of 3 GW of energy storage. However, New York set ambitious clean energy goals through the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act, including generating 70% of the state’s electricity from renewable sources by 2030 and 100% zero emission electricity by 2040. The new order doubles the energy storage goals set in 2018, increasing the target to 6 GW by 2030.

The funding authorizes $814.6 million in total energy storage funding, which breaks down to $675 million for 1.5 GW of community and C&I energy storage incentives, $100 million for 200 MW of residential incentives, and $39.6 million for program administration.

“Expanding energy storage technology is a key component to building New York’s clean energy future and reaching our climate goals,” said Governor Hochul. “This new framework provides New York with the resources it needs to speed up our transition to a green economy, while ensuring the reliability and resilience of our grid.”

According to New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), these future procurements, combined with the 1.3 GW of existing energy storage being procured or already under contract and getting closer to commercial operation, will allow New York to achieve its 6 GW goal by 2030. NYSERDA reports that as of April 1, 2024, New York has awarded about $200 million to support approximately 396 MW of operating energy storage in the state.

“Governor Hochul has long been a staunch supporter of energy storage development in New York State, and with her steadfast support, we have been able to develop this roadmap to guide New York away from fossil-burning power plants to a clean energy economy,” said Rory M. Christian, chair of the Public Service Commission.

The Roadmap includes:

  • 3,000 MW of new bulk storage, enough to power approximately one million homes for up to four hours, to be procured through a new competitive Index Storage Credit mechanism;
  • Use of at least 35% of program funding to support projects that deliver benefits to Disadvantaged Communities (DACs) and that target fossil fuel peaker plant emissions reductions, with program carve-outs for projects sited in the downstate region, given its high concentration of DACs and peaker plants;
  • Requiring electric utilities to study the potential of high-value energy storage projects toward providing cost-effective transmission and distribution services not currently available through existing markets;
  • Continued prioritization by existing programs on investing in R&D related to reliable long-duration energy storage technologies; and
  • Requiring payment of prevailing wage for energy storage projects with a capacity of 1 MW and above.
  • Fire safety requirements must be in NYSERDA Implementation Plans, reflecting recommendations from the Fire Safety Working Group.

“By setting clear and ambitious targets for energy storage deployment and creating robust incentive structures for both retail and residential projects, this order lays the foundation for a cleaner, more reliable energy grid. NYSEIA applauds the dedication and vision of these agencies, and we look forward to continuing our collaboration to achieve these critical goals for the benefit of all New Yorkers” New York Solar Energy Industries Association (NYSEIA) said.

The roadmap will support a buildout of storage deployments estimated to reduce projected future statewide electric system costs by nearly $2 billion, according to NYSERDA, in addition to further benefits in the form of improved public health because of reduced exposure to harmful fossil fuel pollutants.

“With more renewable generation than any other state on the east coast, deep duration storage is only going to become more critical to keeping the lights on as New York continues to work towards its decarbonization goals,” said Jordan Cole, chief commercial officer of Hydrostor. “New York has recognized that 8+ hour storage is needed to move the energy transition forward while maintaining the reliability of the grid, and we’re confident that other states will follow. We look forward to working with NYSERDA on its implementation plan.”

Next steps to be taken include the development of implementation plans by NYSERDA, which will include stakeholder input. The commission will then review and approve the plans before the incentives are made available.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/21/new-york-policy-authorizes-814-6-million-to-fund-energy-storage/feed/ 0 105524
Sunrise brief: Final guidance released on IRA’s prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/20/sunrise-brief-final-guidance-released-on-iras-prevailing-wage-and-apprenticeship-requirements/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/20/sunrise-brief-final-guidance-released-on-iras-prevailing-wage-and-apprenticeship-requirements/#respond Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:00:10 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105472 Also on the rise: U.S. grid-scale storage grows 84%, residential storage 48%. Planted Solar reports doubled energy per acre with terrain-following array. And more.

BASF, NGK launch sodium-sulfur battery with less than 1% degradation rate A set of technological improvements incorporated into the new product NAS MODEL L24 allows for lower maintenance costs compared to the earlier sodium sulfur battery type developed by the two manufacturers.

NREL guide for anyone seeking more solar and storage in utility resource plans A guide to utility resource plans aims to help state regulators and others engage effectively with utilities in reviewing the plans, which have often been challenged for limiting solar and storage in projections of new generating capacity needed.

Nextracker expands U.S. manufacturing with Unimacts Owned by Unimacts and located near Las Vegas, this factory will produce steel components exclusively for Nextracker, bringing the tracker specialist’s annual domestic solar tracker capacity to over 30 GW.

Final guidance released on IRA’s prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements According to the Treasury Department, developers of clean energy projects may be able to claim an increased credit equal to five times the base incentive.

Solar startup claims doubled energy per acre with terrain-following array California startup Planted Solar uses construction robots and high-density arrays to deliver what the company says are higher energy outputs and lower balance of system costs.

U.S. grid-scale storage grows 84%, residential storage 48% Wood Mackenzie reported large growth in Q1 year-over-year for grid-scale storage and residential storage, while commercial and industrial storage slowed.

Commercial real estate to host VPP-connected flywheels and batteries U.S.-based technology provider Torus has agreed to supply nearly 26 MWh of energy storage for Gardner Group’s commercial real estate portfolio. The project will integrate battery and flywheel energy storage systems (BESS, FESS) with Torus’ proprietary energy management platform.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/20/sunrise-brief-final-guidance-released-on-iras-prevailing-wage-and-apprenticeship-requirements/feed/ 0 105472
Final guidance released on IRA’s prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/18/final-guidance-released-on-iras-prevailing-wage-and-apprenticeship-requirements/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/18/final-guidance-released-on-iras-prevailing-wage-and-apprenticeship-requirements/#respond Tue, 18 Jun 2024 17:45:21 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105464 According to the Treasury Department, developers of clean energy projects may be able to claim an increased credit equal to five times the base incentive.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released final rules on the Inflation Reduction Act’s (IRA) prevailing wage and registered apprenticeship requirements.

The IRA includes a myriad of incentives including the production tax credit, investment tax credit, energy community adder, and more. But in order to take advantage of these, solar developers must meet specific guidelines as far as pay, number of apprentices employed and ratio of workers who come from qualified apprenticeship programs. Treasury said in a statement that by following these rules, “taxpayers can claim an increased credit equal to five times the base incentive. This includes projects utilizing the investment and production tax credits that help finance utility-scale wind, solar, and battery storage projects, as well as for credits for carbon capture, utilization, and storage and clean hydrogen projects.”

The goal of the prevailing wage and registered apprenticeship (PWA) provisions in the IRA are to ensure that those working in the clean energy industry receive fair pay, and also to encourage apprenticeship programs that will build a skilled workforce.

The clean energy projects that resulted from the IRA have created more than 270,000 jobs, according to the Treasury Department, which said studies show that more than 1.5 million additional jobs will be created over the next decade. The Department of Labor released an interactive map that shows clean energy projects across the country that could be eligible for enhanced tax incentives if taxpayers satisfy the prevailing wage and registered apprenticeship provisions, as well as other applicable IRA requirements.

“President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act has driven an investment boom while ensuring that workers building the clean energy economy benefit from good pay and new opportunities to get ahead,” said Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen. “Treasury’s final rules ensure we have skilled workers ready to take advantage of the jobs being created by these historic investments.”

The PWA requirements took effect in January 2023, after which time more than 300 public comments were received and considered, according to Treasury, in developing the final rules.

Details of the final rules include:

  • Requiring that determinations of prevailing wage rates be made by DOL, consistent with the Davis-Bacon Act;
  • Incentivizing practices that will encourage contemporaneous compliance;
  • Implementing strong recordkeeping requirements;
  • Guaranteeing that taxpayers with projects covered by qualifying project labor agreements do not need to pay penalties; and
  • Clarifying apprenticeship requirements such as clearly defining what constitutes as a request for qualified apprentices, what constitutes as a response, and when the good faith effort exception applies.

Departments of Treasury and Labor encourage developers to consider project labor agreements (PLA), which reportedly can help taxpayers comply with the PWA requirements. To better understand PLAs, read the blog “Project Labor Agreements: A Best Practice for Clean Energy Projects Seeking to Meet IRA Wage and Apprenticeship Standards” by Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Wally Adeyemo and Acting Secretary of Labor Julie Su.

The IRS said it plans to “dedicate significant resources to promoting and enforcing compliance with the final clean energy rules”. One of those resources will be a new PWA fact sheet that provides a summary of the requirements and as well as how to alert the IRS of suspected tax violations related to the PWA increase.

Furthermore, the Labor Department and the IRS will sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) by the end of the year that is intended to facilitate public outreach, education and development of training content for IRS examination personnel who will be tasked with ensuring PWA compliance.

“One of the greatest promises of the Inflation Reduction Act is that it will create and maintain good-paying, union jobs in the clean economy, while building inclusive pathways into the highest quality training for lifelong careers in construction,” said Jason Walsh, executive director of the BlueGreen Alliance. “With this rule we are seeing how that promise will come to fruition. We are excited to see this progress and look forward to continuing to work with the administration to ensure that the Inflation Reduction Act delivers for workers and communities across the country.”

An unpublished rule is available here. On June 25, 2024, the IRS will publish the rules here.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/18/final-guidance-released-on-iras-prevailing-wage-and-apprenticeship-requirements/feed/ 0 105464
NREL guide for anyone seeking more solar and storage in utility resource plans https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/18/nrel-guide-for-anyone-seeking-more-solar-and-storage-in-utility-resource-plans/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/18/nrel-guide-for-anyone-seeking-more-solar-and-storage-in-utility-resource-plans/#respond Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:30:54 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105387 A guide to utility resource plans aims to help state regulators and others engage effectively with utilities in reviewing the plans, which have often been challenged for limiting solar and storage in projections of new generating capacity needed.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/18/nrel-guide-for-anyone-seeking-more-solar-and-storage-in-utility-resource-plans/feed/ 0 105387
Sunrise brief: Titan Solar latest in residential solar business closures https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/18/sunrise-brief-titan-solar-latest-in-residential-solar-business-closures/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/18/sunrise-brief-titan-solar-latest-in-residential-solar-business-closures/#respond Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:05:03 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105378 Also on the rise: Reshore solar manufacturing but don’t stall construction with tariffs, suggests union official. Princeton NuEnergy scores $30 million in funding for lithium battery recycling. And more.

Reshore solar manufacturing but don’t stall construction with tariffs, suggests union official A leader of a union whose members work in construction and maintenance said the union supported a moratorium on tariffs on certain imported solar panels, as domestic panel output increases, to preserve opportunities in solar construction and installation.

Bill seeks to establish community solar market in Michigan Community solar projects are non-utility owned assets that allow customers to subscribe to a portion of the project’s electricity generation capacity in exchange for bill credits.

Titan Solar latest in residential solar business closures An email informed company employees that the company had ended operations.

Long-duration stability of perovskite solar cells US scientists have analyzed the impact of “seasoning” a formamidinium lead iodide solution with two-dimensional (2D) perovskites. They have found that the template improved the efficiency and durability of their solar cells.

Princeton NuEnergy scores $30 million in funding for lithium battery recycling The low-temperature plasma-assisted separation process, developed at Princeton University and now trademarked as LPAS, produces battery-grade cathode and anode materials suitable for direct reintroduction into cell manufacturing.

Soltec launches specially designed floating PV tracker Soltec has developed a floating PV tracker with pumps in the central tank for mobility and ballast, enabling operation in wind gusts above 100 km/h.

Longi claims 34.6% efficiency for perovskite-silicon tandem solar cell The European Solar Test Installation (ESTI) confirmed Longi’s achievement of a world record-breaking efficiency rating of 34.6% for a perovskite-silicon tandem solar cell.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/18/sunrise-brief-titan-solar-latest-in-residential-solar-business-closures/feed/ 0 105378
Solar antidumping tariffs back in the spotlight https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/18/solar-antidumping-tariffs-back-in-the-spotlight/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/18/solar-antidumping-tariffs-back-in-the-spotlight/#respond Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:29:55 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105412 After a two-year pause, antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) tariffs on solar components shipped from Southeast Asia are set to resume in June 2024.

From pv magazine 6/24

AD/CVD tariffs for US-imported solar components from Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, and Cambodia have been paused since 2022. Should they resume, tariffs of between 50% and 250% of the cost of shipped goods would apply to components from China that are found to have been dumped in the affected Southeast Asian nations for import to the United States.

The tariff moratorium is set to expire in June 2024 and a new AD/CVD investigation has been launched. A petition signed by the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee coalition was filed in late April 2024 and, on May 15, 2024, the US International Trade Commission and the Department of Customs announced an investigation would be launched into suppliers from the four Southeast Asian nations.

Petition filers

Companies that signed the petition include First Solar, Qcells, Meyer Burger, REC Silicon, and others that have invested in US solar manufacturing capacity. The petitioners said the US solar “manufacturing renaissance” was threatened by heavily subsidized Chinese cells and modules.

“China’s unfair and illegal trade practices have inundated the market with dumped solar panels, undercutting the US ability to compete,” said the group. Solar module prices have fallen by more than half over the last 12 months to a record low, according to online solar trading platform pvXchange.

If US solar developers sourced 55% of solar goods domestically, 900,000 US jobs would be supported by 2035, said the petitioners. They added that “onshoring” the solar supply chain would cut solar manufacturing emissions by 30%.

Difficult position

With almost 80% of US solar modules imported from Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, and Cambodia, trade measures could threaten supply.

The US Energy Information Administration said the threat of AD/CVD tariffs in 2022 had prompted delays or the cancellation of around 20% of utility-scale solar generation capacity.

Investment bank Roth Capital has been told a “non-trivial amount of [solar] projects that have not secured modules, especially for 2025,” could be affected by AD/CVD measures. Projects that have already secured modules through 2025 should be unaffected.

AD/CVD action could drive US module prices for utility-scale projects to $0.40/W to $0.50/W of panel generation capacity, Clean Energy Associates (CEA) told a Roth Capital webinar. Late 2023 saw such module prices fall to a record low $0.13/W and CEA estimated Southeast Asian imports would remain at around $0.20/W without new AD/CVD action.

CEA anticipates new AD/CVD measures could cause a bottleneck of duty-free PV cells and flip an oversupplied solar market into shortages. The company estimated the 18 GW of annual crystalline silicon cell production capacity outside AD/CVD-investigated nations in early 2024 – plus 17 GW of US-based thin film capacity – would be less than projected US demand in 2024.

“This means that there will likely be duties applied to some of the modules serving the US market – or the cells imported to make these modules – starting later this year,” said CEA. “This is likely to greatly reduce import levels, as occurred in the second quarter of 2022 when the anti-circumvention case was filed. If these duties are passed along to buyers, they will introduce uncertainty to the financial models that projects depend on. This will potentially cause projects to be delayed, canceled, and/or sold.”

Crunch time

With the US International Trade Commission investigation launched, a preliminary determination of material injury, or the threat of material injury to domestic manufacturers must be determined within 45 days of the filing, from May 15, 2024. A final determination would likely be made by spring 2025.

Canadian Solar, a leading solar panel supplier with operations in Southeast Asia, responded to the investigation by calling into question South Korean owned company Qcells’ status as a US manufacturer. It said that the company is a “US importer of subject merchandise” and “primarily a foreign producer.”

Qcells, which primarily manufactures in Malaysia, is also the largest crystalline silicon module producer in the United States, manufacturing around 5.1 GW of modules there annually. The company said in early 2023, that it plans to invest more than $2.5 billion in 3.3 GW of solar ingot, wafer, cell, and module factories in the US state of Georgia.

Since the passage of the US Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, which contained rich incentives for clean energy manufacturing, multinational solar manufacturers have begun to move operations into the United States. In 2023, Trina Solar, Canadian Solar, and Longi all announced 5 GW solar module manufacturing facilities, potentially adding a combined 15 GW of US-based solar production capacity. To put that investment into context, each of those factories would represent $200 million to $600 million in capital expenditure. Many gigawatt-scale US factory announcements have been made by global suppliers since then, with many new fabs and expansions announced over the past two years.

Capacity mismatch

Much of the announced capacity in the United States concerns the final step of the solar module supply chain: module assembly. If the United States wants to establish an independent solar supply chain, it will need to incentivize the production of polysilicon, solar ingots, wafers, and solar cells, in order to feed this module demand.

CEA said there is currently a mismatch in US production capacity, with much of the focus on module assembly. The company expects around 30 GW of annual module manufacturing capacity in the United States by 2027 but only 3 GW of ingot and wafer lines and 17 GW of polysilicon facilities.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/18/solar-antidumping-tariffs-back-in-the-spotlight/feed/ 0 105412
Bill seeks to establish community solar market in Michigan https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/17/bill-seeks-to-establish-community-solar-market-in-michigan/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/17/bill-seeks-to-establish-community-solar-market-in-michigan/#respond Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:01:19 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105406 Community solar projects are non-utility owned assets that allow customers to subscribe to a portion of the project’s electricity generation capacity in exchange for bill credits.

A pair of bills that would establish rules for a community solar market are working their way through the Michigan legislature. If passed, Senate bills 152 and 153 of 2023 would enable customers to subscribe to off-site solar facilities, paying a monthly rate for electricity generated by the project in exchange for offsets on their utility bills.

The legislation would require all customer classes to have access to community solar subscriptions, and it would contain a carve-out that ensures at least 30% of the electricity produced is serving low-income households or low-income service organizations.

The bill would also provide for the transferability and portability of subscriptions, including a subscriber’s retention of a subscription to a community solar facility if the subscriber moves within the same electric provider’s service territory.

Senator Ed McBroom, a Republican serving Waucedah Township, said the legislation would allow Michigan residents to “escape the ever-increasing rates” from electricity providers.

“As we’ve shackled our residents to fossil fuels and a limited system that requires them to go through providers, the rates have just gone up and up and up and up and up,” said Senator Jeff Irwin (D–Ann Arbor).

Michigan’s electric utilities have opposed the bill.

“Unfortunately, this legislation completely misses the mark while putting Michigan’s clean energy transformation at risk and raising costs for everyone,” said Tracy Wimmer, a spokesperson for utility Consumers Energy.

Consumers Energy has its own internal “community” solar program that is utility owned and managed. The proposed solar legislation would destroy its monopoly control of the market.

The need for non-utility-run community solar projects has more implications than fighting a monopoly and securing rates. It will also enable Michigan to access federal funds as part of the $7 billion Solar For All program, which requires community solar projects to be owned independently from utilities for program eligibility.

(Read: “Calculating potential impact of EPA’s $7 billion Solar for All program”) 

“Without a community solar enabling policy here in Michigan that allows independently owned projects, we will be leaving a key policy lever off the table on our ability to take full advantage of the Solar for All funding and provide the energy cost-saving benefits to residents that true community solar provides,” said Tim Minotas, deputy legislative director, Sierra Club Michigan. 

Track the bills’ progress for Senate Bill 152 and 153.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/17/bill-seeks-to-establish-community-solar-market-in-michigan/feed/ 0 105406
Reshore solar manufacturing but don’t stall construction with tariffs, suggests union official https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/17/reshore-solar-manufacturing-but-dont-stall-construction-with-tariffs-suggests-union-official/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/17/reshore-solar-manufacturing-but-dont-stall-construction-with-tariffs-suggests-union-official/#respond Mon, 17 Jun 2024 13:20:38 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105373 A leader of a union whose members work in construction and maintenance said the union supported a moratorium on tariffs on certain imported solar panels, as domestic panel output increases, to preserve opportunities in solar construction and installation.

Two-thirds of jobs in the solar industry are in construction and installation, versus 13% in manufacturing, said a union leader on a webinar hosted by the American Clean Power Association (ACP).

“We’re a little concerned that the “tail” of manufacturing “could wag the dog,” said Jeff Soth, legislative and political director of the International Union of Operating Engineers, referencing his union’s support for a moratorium on solar panel tariffs that support domestic solar manufacturing. “We’ve adopted the ACP position,” he said.

Chiming in, Bill Parsons, American Clean Power (ACP) senior vice president and political director, said Soth had “articulated a really important principle, which I think our member companies would subscribe to, which is a very firm desire and commitment to reshore as much of the supply chain as we can, as quickly as we can, consistent with deployment.”

“If you cut off” foreign solar panel supply “too quickly,” Parsons said, “you haven’t really helped anything. You’ve just slowed down the construction jobs and the benefits for the grid and for the economy.” Parsons said companies are faced with a dilemma, “the choice to buy stuff that doesn’t exist yet.”

Two-thirds of operating engineers work in construction, Soth said, typically operating equipment such as cranes and backhoes, while one-third are maintenance engineers. Operating engineers work across all energy industries, he said.

Union support for projects

Turning to the potential for union support of new projects, Brad Markell, principal with Clean Energy Labor Advisors, said “you see some opposition” to both utility-scale solar projects and transmission projects. Yet “local unions, that are everywhere, are a key locus for local participation,” he said. Unions can add value “early in community involvement, because union members are living in these communities, and once they understand there’s a potential project coming through their area that they would like to work on, they become advocates.”

Soth said three unions had responded to a request from the solar industry, which led to a tri-trades agreement among the unions representing “the three essential crafts to build solar generation,” namely operating engineers, electricians and laborers. “We’re in the business of meeting the needs of owners and developers,” he said, “and they demanded, frankly, a streamlined project labor agreement with the three essential crafts, and that’s what we gave them.”

Wages, apprenticeships

“The skills and productivity” of union members, Soth said, give the union “a competitive edge, and frankly, allow us to command at the negotiating table the kinds of wages and benefits that our folks receive.”

Noting that a prevailing wage requirement is a condition for receiving energy tax credits, Soth said the requirement “provides some support for our role in the workplace and ensures that the green jobs of the future are, in fact, good jobs.” Clean energy industries have struggled, he said, “to be able to demonstrate that those are family sustaining jobs, particularly in the solar industry, historically, and that’s a function of residential deployment, small projects.”

Noting that women represent less than 25% of construction workers, Soth said his union is “doing everything we can” to recruit women and people of color into the trade, including marketing apprenticeships to students in high school. The operating engineers’ union offers training and apprenticeship programs.

“Apprenticeship is the primary pathway into a career in the operating engineers,” Soth said, adding that apprenticeship is “the best kept secret in career and vocational training.” He suggested that government investment in apprenticeship preparedness would be worthwhile, such as providing young people with “an introduction into the variety of craft unions out there and the opportunities that exist in the construction business.”

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/17/reshore-solar-manufacturing-but-dont-stall-construction-with-tariffs-suggests-union-official/feed/ 0 105373
New York continues long duration energy storage investments with $5M funding initiative https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/14/new-york-continues-long-duration-energy-storage-investments-with-5m-funding-initiative/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/14/new-york-continues-long-duration-energy-storage-investments-with-5m-funding-initiative/#respond Fri, 14 Jun 2024 14:43:36 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105334 NYSERDA is allocating $5 million to fund up to 50% of project costs for developing energy storage systems capable of operating for 10 to 100 hours, addressing key integration challenges and promoting viable economic products within New York’s energy grid.

New York State’s “Renewable Optimization and Energy Storage Innovation Program” is dedicating $5 million to support long duration energy storage (LDES) projects, with project applications due by September 24, 2024 at 3 PM EST. This funding, administered by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), targets innovative solutions capable of delivering energy storage for durations of 10 to 100 hours, within the specified technical categories:

  1. Electrochemical:
    • Including flow batteries and advanced battery solutions
  2. Mechanical
    • Innovative pumped hydro and compressed air/gas solutions
    • Mechanical/gravity energy storage
    • Geomechanical energy storage
  3. Thermal
    • Pumped heat electrical energy storage
    • Thermophotovoltaic (TPV) storage
    • Innovative mediums such as water, sand, molten salts, and rocks

Now in its third iteration, the program finances up to 50% of each approved project’s cost. It prioritizes projects that tackle renewable integration challenges like grid congestion, hosting capacity constraints, and the siting limitations of lithium-ion batteries in New York City. NYSERDA seeks to support technologies that are not yet commercially scaled and are still in developmental stages. Eligible expenses include product development and demonstration projects.

Additionally, the application package stipulates that companies receiving awards must not conduct business in or with Russia.

Proposal evaluation criteria

The proposal scoring criteria lists twenty-eight questions, including:

  • Is the proposed work technically feasible, innovative, and superior to existing alternatives?
  • Are the fundamental scientific principles well understood and clearly articulated?
  • Does the proposed solution have strong potential for commercialization, addressing demonstrated customer needs and significant market opportunities?
  • Is there an appropriate plan for performance monitoring and data analysis included in the proposal?
  • To what extent will there be economic benefits in New York State in the form of subsequent commercial activity and economic growth?
  • How widely can the technology be deployed, both in New York and globally?
  • How realistic is the schedule for achieving the goals of the proposed project?
  • How significant is the commercial potential of this technology?

This funding round follows significant investments in previous years. In the summer of 2023, four demonstration projects received nearly $4 million. Ecolectro was granted just over $1 million to advance sustainable hydrogen technologies; Form Energy received $1.2 million for their iron flow batteries; Polyjule deployed a 167 kW/2 MWh plastic-based battery with slightly over $1 million; and Urban Power was awarded about $700,000 to develop a 100 kW/1 MWh zinc battery.

In 2022, Borrego Solar, JC Solution, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Power to Hydrogen, and Roccera were awarded $16.6 million to develop long-duration energy storage solutions. This funding effort was part of a broader initiative that began in 2020, when New York embarked on a project with Zinc8 to develop long-duration zinc energy storage. Following successful development, Zinc8 decided to manufacture its zinc-air batteries in New York State.

As shown in chart above, New York targets significant energy storage milestones by 2050: achieving 10.4 GW over four hours (41.2 GWh) and 6.7 GW over eight hours (53.6 GWh), pushing toward a total of nearly 100 GWh in bulk energy storage. Yet, as of early 2023, despite its mention in the state’s energy roadmap, New York has not quantified energy storage capacities exceeding ten hours.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/14/new-york-continues-long-duration-energy-storage-investments-with-5m-funding-initiative/feed/ 0 105334
Sunrise brief: Solar represents over 80% of U.S. electric capacity additions in 2024 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/14/sunrise-brief-solar-represents-over-80-of-u-s-electric-capacity-additions-in-2024/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/14/sunrise-brief-solar-represents-over-80-of-u-s-electric-capacity-additions-in-2024/#respond Fri, 14 Jun 2024 12:00:54 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105271 Also on the rise: Hawaii’s largest solar-plus-storage facility now operational. Swift Solar closes $27 million in funding, plans perovskite solar factory. And more.

Startup Giraffe Financial aims to unravel tax credit complexities for businesses Giraffe received a $1.5 million pre-seed round of funding and plans to help underserved small- and medium-sized businesses access IRA tax credits.

CATL, Gotion deny U.S. accusations of forced labor U.S. lawmakers have urged for Chinese battery heavyweights CATL and Gotion High-Tech to be immediately added to an import ban list under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. Both manufacturers have adamantly denied the allegations.

Bitech Technologies sells 2.4 GW of solar to focus on energy storage Bitech completed the sale of 2.425 GW of its greenfield solar projects to “a third party purchaser”. The company plans to turn its focus to its battery storage business, which it believes, could ensure better investment returns.

Hawaii’s largest solar-plus-storage facility now operational The 60 MW Kūihelani solar-plus-storage facility will generate enough electricity for 27,000 homes, with a 240 MWh battery energy storage system.

Solar represents over 80% of U.S. electric capacity additions in 2024 Combined with wind, the two technologies represent 99% of all capacity additions, according to data from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).

Maxeon reveals minimized risk of hotspots in IBC solar panels Maxeon’s Interdigitated Back Contact (IBC) solar panels were found to disperse heat evenly, leading to lower operating temperatures in the shade and reduced degradation.

Swift Solar closes $27 million in funding, plans perovskite solar factory Swift Solar, a specialist in perovskite tandem photovoltaics, plans to build a factory in the U.S. in the next two to three years to manufacture thin-film solar.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/14/sunrise-brief-solar-represents-over-80-of-u-s-electric-capacity-additions-in-2024/feed/ 0 105271
Hawaii’s largest solar-plus-storage facility now operational https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/13/hawaiis-largest-solar-plus-storage-facility-now-operational/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/13/hawaiis-largest-solar-plus-storage-facility-now-operational/#respond Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:23:34 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105264 The 60 MW Kūihelani solar-plus-storage facility will generate enough electricity for 27,000 homes, with a 240 MWh battery energy storage system.

Hawaii has the highest average electricity price of any state at 43.93 cents per kWh, nearly triple the U.S. average, yet this project will cut that cost for many residents. Developer AES Hawaii projects that the Kūihelani Solar-plus-Storage facility will generate enough electricity for 15% of Maui’s needs at just 8 cents per kWh.

“Maui residents will soon be seeing the benefit of Kuihelani in their electric bills and the reassurance of knowing they will have reliable electrical power for their homes and businesses,” said former Maui Mayor Victorino.

Islands that are not covering their energy needs with renewables are beholden to imported fossil fuels. The energy generated by this facility will offset the need to import an estimated 2 million barrels of oil.

Situated on 450 acres in central Maui, between Kūihelani Highway and Maui Veterans Highway, the project supports the state’s goal of 100% renewable energy and decarbonization targets by 2045. AES Hawaii broke ground for construction less than two years ago, and as with most large-scale solar projects, the company sought input from the community prior to construction. As a result, AES Hawaii modified its plans.

“We reduced the size of the project site by 35%, minimizing the project’s environmental footprint, while maximizing the usage of the available land in a responsible manner,” said Sandra Larsen, Hawaii market business leader for AES.

Hawaiian Electric is the offtaker of the electricity, having signed a 25-year power purchase agreement with AES Hawaii.

Nearly 300 jobs were supported during construction of Kūihelani Solar-plus-Storage and and generated approximately $68 million for Maui’s economy, according to AES Hawaii. In addition, project area is also designed for agricultural use.

AES Hawaii more than 300 MW of renewable energy in construction or operational, enough to power 120,000 homes statewide. The company estimates that this is the equivalent of eliminating more than 175,000 metric tons of carbon emissions and more than 15 million barrels of oil consumption over the course of project lifecycles.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/13/hawaiis-largest-solar-plus-storage-facility-now-operational/feed/ 0 105264
CATL, Gotion deny U.S. accusations of forced labor https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/13/catl-gotion-deny-u-s-accusations-of-forced-labor/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/13/catl-gotion-deny-u-s-accusations-of-forced-labor/#respond Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:00:39 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105255 U.S. lawmakers have urged for Chinese battery heavyweights CATL and Gotion High-Tech to be immediately added to an import ban list under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. Both manufacturers have adamantly denied the allegations.

From pv magazine ESS News

Battery manufacturers CATL and Gotion High-Tech have denied U.S. lawmakers’ claims of forced labor in their supply chains, calling the accusations groundless and false.

On June 6, a group of U.S. Republican lawmakers have called on the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to immediately add CATL and Gotion High-Tech to a Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) Entity List and and block the shipments of these companies from entering the US.

“The Select Committee has uncovered indisputable evidence that Gotion High-Tech and CATL have supply chains that are deeply connected to forced labor and the ongoing genocide of Uyghurs in China,” House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party Chairman John Moolenaar said. “The American people expect companies in the U.S. to avoid all involvement with the Chinese Communist Party’s campaign of genocide.”

CATL said in a press release on June 7 that the accusations are “groundless and completely false” and that information about some of its suppliers in the letter to the DHS is inaccurate and misleading.

“With some suppliers, business relations ceased long ago. With other suppliers, business relations have been conducted with different subsidiaries and with absolutely no connection to forced labor or anything that violates US applicable laws and regulations,” the company said.

CATL said it adheres to the highest business and ethical standards and has effective policies in place to ensure a responsible and sustainable supply chain according to the highest global standards.

Read more here.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/13/catl-gotion-deny-u-s-accusations-of-forced-labor/feed/ 0 105255
Solar module prices increase for first time in years, Anza reports https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/12/solar-module-prices-increase-for-first-time-in-years-anza-reports/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/12/solar-module-prices-increase-for-first-time-in-years-anza-reports/#respond Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:28:57 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105240 Using its own database of price quotes, the Anza Q2 Pricing Insights Report highlights the first price increase in years as a result of AD/CVD petition and the reinstatement of bifacial import duties.

Anza, a solar and energy storage supply chain platform, Q2 Pricing Insights Report aggregates data from 95% of the U.S. solar module supply year to date to provide pricing changes that result from market forces and regulatory changes. With the Q2 report on the U.S. solar module market shows the first price increase in years. Anza attributes this to the latest AD/CVD petition and reinstatement of bifacial import duties.

“After years of record low pricing, we’re seeing the market start to rebound as domestic manufacturers have less pricing pressure from foreign producers that are subject to tariffs,” said Mike Hall, CEO of Anza. “We’re expecting to see this upward price trend continue from here, making it critical for new projects to consider current pricing and potential tariff impacts when sourcing materials.”

Anza’s Q2 report looks at module pricing trends from March to May 2024 and finds that while there was a downward pricing trend in March and April, prices bounced up in May.

Looking at the period from February to May 2024, the median module price dropped from 27.9 cents per watt to 25 cents per watt, marking an 11% decrease. The most substantial change occurred between February and March 2024, when prices fell by 2.5 cents or 8.6%.

The report noted that while TOPCon prices remained steady from January to February, they dropped right alongside PERC through April. Anza attributes advancements in TOPCon manufacturing and increased competition from foreign suppliers as driving these price declines.

Then in May, following the AD/CVD petition, prices began to rise again at about 2%. Anza report authors acknowledge that while this is only a small increase, it is significant because it is the first time since late 2022 that prices have increased.

The report drills trend data down to a weekly basis, which that the median price dropped to 24 cents per watt the week of April 22, hitting what Anza suggests is the pricing floor. Since that time prices have climbed back and held at 25 cents per watt through the end of May; an increase of 4%. Anza anticipates that this upward trend due to the looming AD/CVD petition.

The report contends that “new solar module tariffs and regulatory changes have materially affected pricing, though we are only starting to see early signs of those impacts”.

The tariffs referred to include the new bifacial tariff as well as the looming fallout from an AD/CVD petition officially filed on April 24, 2024, against Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. The report notes that while preliminary antidumping determinations for this case are not expected until Q4 of this year, additional duties could be applied retroactively as early as May or June 2024.

AD/CVD laws assess tariffs on goods that are found to be dodging import duties by dumping products in other countries before shipping them to the U.S. In the previous AD/CVD proceeding, four Southeastern Asian countries, Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand and Malaysia, which were responsible for roughly 80% of the U.S. supply of solar components, were alleged as potentially harboring dumped products from China.

The recent AD/CVD petition filed by the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee, which includes First Solar, Qcells, Meyer Burger, REC Silicon, and others, claims that the U.S. “manufacturing renaissance” is threatened by heavily subsidized Chinese cells and modules.

[Read more about AD/CVD history in Solar panel import tariffs are affecting the industry by increasing prices by up to 286%]

Anza’s quarterly Pricing Insights Report looks at the impact of both government incentive programs, such as the IRA, and AD/CVD tariffs—in addition to the recently reinstated tariffs on bifacial solar modules, which generate electricity on both sides of the panel. Bifacial solar modules were previously exempt from tariffs, and the removal of the exemption reinstates a 15% tariff.

The report also compares Tier 1 module pricing to that of Non-Tier 1, and finds that the gap between the two has closed in the near term. The report finds that Tier 1 module prices dropped from 29 cents per watt to 25 cents per watt, marking a 14.8% decrease. Meanwhile, Non-Tier 1 module prices fell from 25 cents to 24 cents per watt, a 4.1% reduction.

In 2023 Anza was spun out of Borrego Solar after Borrego developed the solar and battery storage online marketplace and optimization solution. The proprietary software that drives the digital marketplace identifies the most optimized solar module and storage components based on customer-provided project details.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/12/solar-module-prices-increase-for-first-time-in-years-anza-reports/feed/ 0 105240
New York invests $5 million in agrivoltaics https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/12/new-york-invests-5-million-in-agrivoltaics/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/12/new-york-invests-5-million-in-agrivoltaics/#respond Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:00:26 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105216 The Empire State seeks “active farming,” such as cattle grazing, cannabis, corn, foraging, or specialty crops, on solar power sites. Offers up to $750,000 per site for demonstration projects that share data publicly.

The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) announced that $5 million is now available for demonstration projects that co-locate solar and agriculture within the state. Each project can receive up to $750,000. The state aims to expand the body of knowledge on the technical and financial viability of solar agrivoltaic facilities.

Participants in the program must agree to share data on the projects, including costs, benefits, lessons learned, and to host educational events open to the public.

Applications can be submitted through the NYSERDA website September 12, 2024, at 3 p.m.

Agrivoltaic facilities that are part of a larger solar facility should submit their application accounting only for the solar power area that is part of the agrivoltaic experiment. For instance, a 5 MW solar facility that integrates corn cultivation within 1 MW of solar panels should apply as a 1 MW agrivoltaic facility.

Agrivoltaic projects must be a minimum of 100 kW and are limited to 5 MWac.

According to NYSERDA summary documentation, eligible crops, livestock, and livestock products include, but are not limited to:

  • Field crops, including corn, wheat, oats, rye, barley, hay, potatoes and dry beans.
  • Fruits, such as apples, peaches, grapes, cherries and berries.
  • Vegetables, such as tomatoes, snap beans, cabbage, carrots, beets and onions.
  • Horticultural specialties, including nursery stock, ornamental shrubs, ornamental trees, and flowers.
  • Livestock and livestock products, including cattle, sheep, hogs, goats, horses, poultry, ratites (such as ostriches, emus, rheas and kiwis), farmed deer, farmed buffalo, fur bearing animals, wool bearing animals (such as alpacas and llamas), milk, eggs, and furs.
  • Maple sap.
  • Christmas trees derived from a managed Christmas tree operation whether dug for transplanting or cut from the stump.
  • Aquaculture products, including fish, fish products, water plants and shellfish.
  • Woody biomass, which means short rotation woody crops raised for bioenergy, and does not include farm woodland.
  • Apiary products, including honey, beeswax, royal jelly, bee pollen, propolis, package bees, nucs and queens. “Nucs” are defined as small honeybee colonies created from larger colonies, including the nuc box – a smaller version of a beehive, designed to hold up to five frames from an existing colony.
  • Actively managed log-grown woodland mushrooms.
  • Industrial hemp as defined in Section 505.

Projects that solely include pollinator-friendly ground cover, apiary installation and maintenance, sheep grazing, or crops for biofuel generation are not eligible.

The project application package includes a “General Eligibility Checklist.” A negative response to any of the questions on this form may disqualify the proposal from further consideration.

Source: NYSERDA

A variety of eligible groups, including solar developers, farmers, landowners, nonprofit organizations, educational institutions, and local governments, can submit projects. Individuals and business owners may also apply independently. Teams looking to enhance existing or under-development distributed solar projects must apply through the NY SUN portal and be certified as NY SUN contractors. Additionally, projects associated with the NYSERDA Large Scale Renewable program are eligible.

The total potential prize of $750,000 is split into two parts; it allocates up to $500,000 for funding incremental solar hardware to ensure the facility’s viability. The remaining $250,000 is designated to support the agricultural aspects of the project. Funding will cover no more than $0.50 per watt for the incremental costs of the solar power plant.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/12/new-york-invests-5-million-in-agrivoltaics/feed/ 0 105216
Sunrise brief: U.S. solar trade case moves forward https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/11/sunrise-brief-u-s-solar-trade-case-moves-forward/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/11/sunrise-brief-u-s-solar-trade-case-moves-forward/#respond Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:00:29 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105142 Also on the rise: Bosch unveils water source heat pumps for residential, commercial applications. More states now require smart inverters, enabling more distributed solar. And more.

Bosch unveils water source heat pumps for residential, commercial applications  Bosch Home Comfort has presented two new heat pumps series that can be used for both retrofits and new buildings. Both products have a size of a size of ½ to 6 tons and a coefficient of performance of up to 4.9.

Community solar increases energy equity, report finds For the first time research looks at data about households adopting community solar along with policy that promotes outreach, and the results confirm that coalition efforts are beneficial.

U.S. solar trade case moves forward The U.S. International Trade Commission unanimously voted that solar cell manufacturing in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam, supported by local incentives, is harming U.S. industry. This decision paves the way for the Commerce Department to finalize its determinations on Countervailing Duties by July 18 and Anti-Dumping duties by October 1.

Empowering multifamily housing with Solar for All grants As multifamily housing emerges as a key player in the solar revolution, it is poised to not only benefit from but also drive positive change in the clean energy landscape.

Longi presents 24.4%-efficient 660 W HPBC solar panel Intended for applications in utility-scale PV projects, the new Hi-MO 9 module is available in eight versions with power output ranging from 625 W to 660 W and power conversion efficiency spanning from 23.1% to 24.4%.

More states now require smart inverters, enabling more distributed solar Pennsylvania and Minnesota have joined six other states in requiring smart inverters for distributed solar and storage. Certain utilities in 13 states and Puerto Rico also require smart inverters, while six states are considering the requirement. Smart inverters enable more solar on distribution circuits.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/11/sunrise-brief-u-s-solar-trade-case-moves-forward/feed/ 0 105142
More states now require smart inverters, enabling more distributed solar https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/10/more-states-now-require-smart-inverters-enabling-more-distributed-solar/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/10/more-states-now-require-smart-inverters-enabling-more-distributed-solar/#respond Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:32:29 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105136 Pennsylvania and Minnesota have joined six other states in requiring smart inverters for distributed solar and storage. Certain utilities in 13 states and Puerto Rico also require smart inverters, while six states are considering the requirement. Smart inverters enable more solar on distribution circuits.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/10/more-states-now-require-smart-inverters-enabling-more-distributed-solar/feed/ 0 105136
U.S. solar trade case moves forward https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/10/u-s-solar-trade-case-moves-forward/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/10/u-s-solar-trade-case-moves-forward/#respond Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:35:13 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105117 The U.S. International Trade Commission unanimously voted that solar cell manufacturing in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam, supported by local incentives, is harming U.S. industry. This decision paves the way for the Commerce Department to finalize its determinations on Countervailing Duties by July 18 and Anti-Dumping duties by October 1.

In its preliminary findings, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) found reasonable indications that the domestic solar module manufacturing industry is being materially harmed by imported solar cells from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. These countries have been identified as providing governmental incentives for setting up manufacturing facilities, sparking this investigation.

The complaint was initially brought forward by the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee, which includes prominent members such as First Solar, Hanwha Qcells USA, and Mission Solar Energy, according to the USITC. The group’s press release also named Convalt Energy, REC Silicon and Swift Solar.

Industry insiders told pv magazine USA that this outcome was expected from this group. 

A detailed report titled “Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Inv. Nos. 701-TA-722-725 and 731-TA-1690-1693 is scheduled for release on July 5, 2024, on the USITC website.

The specific outcome from this meeting is that the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) will continue its most recent ongoing investigation on the topic. Commerce will release its preliminary determination results on Countervailing Duties on July 18, with Anti-Dumping results due on October 1. These will be followed by final rulings from Commerce and the USITC’s final rulings on the subject.

In its initial filing, the USITC reported that over the past three years, the four countries have exported 71 GW of solar modules to the U.S., valued at $21 billion. During the same period, the U.S. installed a total of 83.8 GW of solar capacity. Suggested by USITC data, there’s an estimated 50 GW of solar modules currently stored in warehouses across the country. The U.S. Energy Information Administration projects that more than 50 GW of new solar capacity will be installed in the U.S. in 2024.

A significant portion of these imported solar modules is used in utility-scale solar projects.

The merchandise under investigation includes crystalline silicon photovoltaic (CSPV) cells and modules, as well as laminates and panels containing these cells. Excluded from this investigation are thin-film photovoltaic products made from materials such as amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride, or copper indium gallium selenide, typical of products manufactured by First Solar. Off-grid CSPV panels are also excluded from this investigation.

Currently, the cost of importing solar panels into the U.S. could increase dramatically, according to Clean Energy Associates, if the panels originate from China. The collective effect of multiple tariffs – including Section 201, 301, Anti-Dumping, and Countervailing Duties, could raise the price of imported panels by 15% with no Chinese connections, and up to 286% for Vietnamese modules, should the proposed rates be approved.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/10/u-s-solar-trade-case-moves-forward/feed/ 0 105117
Community solar increases energy equity, report finds https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/10/community-solar-increases-energy-equity-report-finds/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/10/community-solar-increases-energy-equity-report-finds/#respond Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:30:53 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105100 For the first time research looks at data about households adopting community solar along with policy that promotes outreach, and the results confirm that coalition efforts are beneficial.

Community solar makes solar accessible to those who live in multifamily housing and don’t own their rooftops, can’t afford the upfront cost of solar or whose roofs are not oriented favorably for solar. A recent study by researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Labs (LBNL) and published in Nature Energy, shows that community solar extends clean energy to communities that would have otherwise struggled to adopt rooftop solar.

“Their findings are compelling: community solar subscribers are 6x more likely to live in multifamily housing and 4x more likely to rent. This reaffirms what we have known to be true for years — community solar is one of the best ways to increase equity in our energy system,” said Molly Knoll, vice president of policy for the Coalition for Community Solar Access (CCSA).

Wood Mackenzie found that the share of community solar serving low-to-moderate income (LMI) subscribers grew from 2% to 10% in just one year, with costs decreasing 30% over the same period. In a report on community solar, Wood Mackenzie expects 7.6 GWdc of new community solar will come online in existing state markets between 2024 and 2028, and the national total of community solar installations are expected to pass 10 GW of cumulative capacity in 2026.

The Wood Mackenzie report noted that residential customers are representing an increasingly larger share of community solar subscriptions, suggesting a shift in focus for developers and providers. Low- and middle-income (LMI) customers rose from 2% of the customer base to 10% from 2022 to 2023, with costs to subscribe these customers declining 30% year-over-year.

Knoll pointed out that the Wood Mackenzie findings along with the LBNL findings, shows that policy that supports community solar adoption by LMI customers cannot only increase solar adoption but can also decrease overall costs.

For the first time, the researchers combine household-level data from Berkeley Lab’s Tracking the Sun rooftop solar adopter data set with data compiled under NREL’s Sharing the Sun community solar research, as well as additional community solar adopter data collected for the study. To determine how well community solar is serving the needs of those who are underserved by the rooftop solar market, the study looked at the demographic characteristics of the two adopter groups.

Based on a sample of 11 states, the LBNL study found that community solar adopters in 2023 were about 6.1 times more likely to live in multifamily buildings than rooftop solar adopters, 4.4 times more likely to rent, and earned 23% less annual income. Based on this, the researchers conclude that community solar has effectively expanded solar access to multifamily housing occupants, renters and low-income households.

The researchers also looked at what drives community solar participation: business models or policy. The business model removes barriers to adoption by allowing households to adopt solar without owning a home or having exclusive access to a rooftop. This is especially appealing to those who live in multifamily buildings and/or who are renters.

On the other hand, the researchers found that policy has helped to provide targeted support to help low-income households adopt community solar.

The conclusion was that business models and policy are equal in influencing community solar.

According to CCSA’s Knoll, this equitable access will increase substantially as more state policies include requirements that projects serve LMI customers. She noted that the $7 billion infusion from the EPA’s Solar for All competition will further speed LMI adoption.

“This study is important confirmation of one of the values community solar can bring to the electric grid and the tireless work our broad and diverse coalitions are doing to bring community solar to every state in the country,” said Knoll.

The authors of the Berkeley Lab study will host a free webinar on June 18th at 11 a.m. PT/2 p.m. ET.

 

 

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/10/community-solar-increases-energy-equity-report-finds/feed/ 0 105100
Sunrise brief: Zinc-ion batteries–a less volatile alternative? https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/10/sunrise-brief-zinc-ion-batteries-a-less-volatile-alternative/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/10/sunrise-brief-zinc-ion-batteries-a-less-volatile-alternative/#respond Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:00:45 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105050 Also on the rise: Qualifying for the brownfield energy tax credit. Solar cell prices hold steady in quiet market. And more.

New frontiers: All-terrain trackers are changing the rules of solar site selection As solar projects are built increasingly in populated areas, community pushback has become a major risk to solar growth and achievement of climate targets. Yet by allowing solar installations to fit the land in its natural form, we can remove one of the most significant sources of pushback. We shouldn’t have to protect nature from solar development.

Walking the hazardous line of qualifying for the brownfield energy tax credit The brownfield credit is significant and, therefore, it behooves a project developer to understand the definitions and rules in order to avoid any potential liability while also qualifying for the credit.

Solar cell prices hold steady in quiet market In a new weekly update for pv magazine, OPIS, a Dow Jones company, provides a quick look at the main price trends in the global PV industry.

Zinc-ion batteries: A less volatile alternative? At a time of growing demand for battery energy storage, pv magazine spoke with Eloisa de Castro, CEO of Enerpoly, a Swedish company preparing to launch the world’s first zinc-ion battery megafactory on its home turf. Having solved rechargeability issues, the company expects its safe and sustainable zinc-ion batteries, which rely solely on a European supply chain, to increase their market share in the years to come.

In case you missed it: Five big solar stories in the news this week  pv magazine USA spotlights news of the past week including market trends, project updates, policy changes and more.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/10/sunrise-brief-zinc-ion-batteries-a-less-volatile-alternative/feed/ 0 105050
In case you missed it: Five big solar stories in the news this week https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/07/in-case-you-missed-it-five-big-solar-stories-in-the-news-this-week-2/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/07/in-case-you-missed-it-five-big-solar-stories-in-the-news-this-week-2/#respond Fri, 07 Jun 2024 22:30:50 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105080 pv magazine USA spotlights news of the past week including market trends, project updates, policy changes and more.]]> pv magazine USA spotlights news of the past week including market trends, project updates, policy changes and more.

Six Flags goes solar
RECOM & Solar Optimum Car Port Installation at Six Flags Magic Mountain

What solar modules are the best? 2024 PV Module Reliability Scorecard from ndependent test lab Kiwa PVEL names 53 manufacturers and 388 models–a record number of Top Performers in the ten-year history of the Scorecard.

World’s largest solar plant tops out at 3.5 GW China Green Development Group switched on the massive Midong solar project in Urumqi, China’s Xinjiang region. The project required an investment of CNY 15.45 billion ($2.13 billion).

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/07/in-case-you-missed-it-five-big-solar-stories-in-the-news-this-week-2/feed/ 0 105080
Walking the hazardous line of qualifying for the brownfield energy tax credit https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/07/walking-the-hazardous-line-of-qualifying-for-the-brownfield-energy-tax-credit/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/07/walking-the-hazardous-line-of-qualifying-for-the-brownfield-energy-tax-credit/#respond Fri, 07 Jun 2024 16:00:50 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105062 The brownfield credit is significant and, therefore, it behooves a project developer to understand the definitions and rules in order to avoid any potential liability while also qualifying for the credit.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) makes available several new financial incentives to encourage the installation of clean energy projects in economically stressed locations. One such incentive is a bonus federal tax credit for projects built on brownfield sites. The brownfield credit is available for wind, solar, geothermal, and other renewable power projects, as well as energy storage facilities, green hydrogen projects, and biogas manufacturing plants.

The brownfield credit is significant. Project owners receive a 10% adder on top of either a Section 48 investment tax credit (ITC) or a Section 45 production tax credit (PTC). A project qualifying for the base 30% ITC would earn an additional 10% ITC, for a total 40% ITC tax credit, while a project receiving the base PTC would earn an additional 10% increment on top of the PTC.  Thus, a project qualifying for a PTC of $27.50/MWh would receive an additional $2.75/MWh.

A project developer that wants to qualify for the brownfield credit should be careful not to present a case that also exposes it to potential cleanup liability or environmental remedial actions, thereby undermining the economic value of the tax credit. The IRS has published guidelines that are helpful to understanding how to walk this hazardous line to sidestep potential liability and still qualify for the brownfield credit. Notice-23-45.pdf

What qualifies as a brownfield site?

A brownfield site is one of three categories eligible for a new “energy community” bonus tax credit.  The other two categories are:

  1. Areas that had significant employment related to oil, gas, or coal activities;
  2. Census tracts or adjoining tracts in which a coal mine closed or a coal-fired electric power plant was retired after December 31, 2009.

The energy community tax credits were created to encourage developers to build clean energy projects at sites that are disproportionately found in historically economically disadvantaged areas, and to repurpose environmentally distressed properties while providing other economic benefits to the community.

For purposes of receiving the tax credit, the IRS defines a “brownfield site” differently from the definition used by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for Superfund liability and federal brownfield cleanup purposes.

The IRS definition of brownfield site is found in Section 39(A) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, or CERCLA,  42 U.S.C. § 9601(39)(A).  The IRS defines a brownfield site as:

Real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant (as defined under 42 U.S.C. § 9601) and certain mine-scarred land (as defined in 42 U.S.C. § 9601(39)(D)(ii)(III)). A brownfield site does not include the categories of property described in 42 U.S.C. § 9601(39)(B).  Notice-23-45.pdf.

The Section 39(B) exclusion generally covers Superfund sites and other contaminated sites that are currently the subject of a court or administrative cleanup order, consent decree, or closure or removal action under designated federal laws.

Unlike the EPA cleanup program, the brownfield definition under the IRA does not include contamination from Controlled Substances (i.e., chlorofluorocarbons and other ozone-depleting substances) or petroleum products.

The EPA, however, recently expanded its definition of hazardous substances under CERCLA to include polyfluoroalkyl substances, otherwise called “PFAS.” PFAS are a group of chemicals found in a wide variety of consumer products, commonly referred to as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment.

The inclusion of PFAS in the brownfield definition significantly expands the number of potential sites that could be eligible for the brownfield credit. By the same token, it raises the risk that developers qualifying for the brownfield credit due to the presence of PFAS could end up becoming potentially responsible parties in a cleanup obligation under CERCLA. The EPA has carved out exceptions to incurring such liability. The prudent approach, however, is to carefully thread the needle to avoid opening up a project to this cleanup obligation in the first place.

Applying the safe harbor rules

The IRS definition of a brownfield site has three parts. The taxpayer must show:

  1. The presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant on the site.
  2. That the presence or potential presence “complicates” the site’s reuse or redevelopment.
  3. That the site does not fall within the excluded category of properties in CERCLA Section 39(B), i.e., sites designated as Superfund sites or that are the subject of a court or administrative cleanup order, consent decree, closure, or removal action.

To simplify the process of qualifying for the brownfield credit, the IRS has established three “safe harbor” categories that it will consider as brownfield sites if a project satisfies any one of the categories and the site does not fall within the Section 39(B) exclusions:

  1. The site was previously assessed through federal, state, territory, or federally recognized Indian tribal brownfield resources as meeting the definition of a brownfield site under 42 U.S.C. §9601(39)(A). Examples of these sites can be found in the category of Brownfields Properties on the EPA’s Cleanups in My Community website or on similar websites maintained by states, territories, or for federally recognized Indian tribes.
  2. An ASTM E1903 Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Phase II ESA) is completed for the site using the most currently applicable ASTM standards that confirms the presence on the site of a hazardous substance, pollutant or contaminant as defined under CERCLA.
  3. If the project has a nameplate capacity no greater than 5MW (AC), an ASTM E1527 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) has been completed for the site using the most currently applicable ASTM standards, and the Phase I ESA identifies the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant or contaminant as defined under CERCLA.[3]

How must a contaminant “complicate” use of a site?

The IRS safe harbor guidelines provide a straightforward way to qualify for the brownfield credit. Notably, the guidelines do not explicitly require a showing that the second prong of the statutory brownfield definition is satisfied, i.e., that the contaminant “complicates” reuse or redevelopment of the site.

The IRS seems to suggest that if one of the safe harbor conditions has been met it will presume that the “complicates” prong is satisfied (The IRS “will accept that a site meets the definition of a brownfield site…if it satisfies at least one of the [three safe harbor] conditions and the site is not described in [CERCLA Section 39(B)].” Notice 2023-29.)

It nevertheless may be prudent for a taxpayer to provide evidence that the presence of contaminants at the site complicates its development or reuse. Such a showing also will be necessary where a project does not fit into the safe harbor categories.

The word “complicate” is a fairly broad term and is not defined either in the IRA or in CERCLA. The term, however, has been interpreted by the courts and the EPA in the context of CERCLA’s brownfield definition. It has been construed to mean “can add cost, time or uncertainty to a redevelopment project,” or make redevelopment “more complex, involved, or difficult in some way.”

These cases make clear that the phrase “may complicate” does not have to rise to the level of a recognized environmental condition, or REC, which can trigger a cleanup obligation or remedial action under federal or state environmental laws.

Thus, the New York Court of Appeals in Lighthouse Point, interpreting the CERCLA brownfield site definition, held that the “statutory definition does not, on its face, mandate the presence of any particular level or degree of contamination.”  Rather, the property will qualify as a brownfield site, “as long as the presence or potential presence of a contaminant within its boundaries makes redevelopment or reuse more complex, involved, or difficult in some way.”

There are several ways to potentially demonstrate how the presence of a contaminant will increase the cost or otherwise make redevelopment of a site more difficult. An environmental consultant who finds the presence (or potential presence) of a contaminant in a Phase I or Phase II ESA, for example, can recommend that the developer or landowner:

  • Use protective equipment or take other precautionary measures for workers on the site.
  • Exercise caution and take protective measures to not unduly disturb soil or groundwater when installing e.g., project foundations, pilings, conduits, frameworks, etc.
  • Undertake testing procedures or install monitoring equipment to check for contaminants.
  • Place transmission lines and other conduits above rather than underground to avoid soil disturbances.
  • Reroute roads and other easements to avoid potential contaminated areas.
  • Apply other common-sense restrictions to site development such as prohibiting installation of drinking wells, residential structures, playgrounds, day care facilities, etc. on the property.

How close to a contaminated area must a project be located to qualify for the brownfield credit?

For the other two “energy community” categories, the IRS looks to see where the energy project will be built to determine whether it is actually “located in” an energy community. For example, the IRS rules use a nameplate capacity test to require that at least 50% of the project’s footprint is located within the census tract that had significant employment related to oil, gas, or coal activities.

Similar locational language does not appear to be applicable to brownfield sites. The IRS instead will permit a project to be located anywhere on a site where a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant is present without requiring that the project be located on the contaminated portion of the site. The IRS states that:

A brownfield site is delineated according to the boundaries of the entire parcel of real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. A brownfield site is not limited to only the portion of a parcel of real property that has or may have a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant that complicates redevelopment.

Accordingly, if a project satisfies the safe harbor rules, or demonstrates that the presence or potential presence of contamination on the site may complicate its redevelopment or reuse, then the project will be eligible for the brownfield credit, whether or not the project is located on the contaminated portion of the brownfield site.

Merrill Kramer Pierce Atwood

Merrill L. Kramer is an attorney and partner at Pierce Atwood in Washington D.C. He represents energy project developers, private equity companies, and institutional lenders on the development, financing, sale, acquisition, and investment in energy projects and portfolios. He has been ranked as one of the top energy lawyers in the country by Best Lawyers, Martindale-Hubbell and The Legal 500and recently was awarded the National Law Review’s “Go-To Thought Leadership Award” for his detailed and cogent analysis of the impact of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 on the clean energy industry.

 

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/07/walking-the-hazardous-line-of-qualifying-for-the-brownfield-energy-tax-credit/feed/ 0 105062
Sunrise brief: Solar panel import tariffs increasing prices by up to 286% https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/07/sunrise-brief-solar-panel-import-tariffs-increasing-prices-by-up-to-286/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/07/sunrise-brief-solar-panel-import-tariffs-increasing-prices-by-up-to-286/#respond Fri, 07 Jun 2024 11:24:31 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105008 Also on the rise: Total U.S. solar module manufacturing capacity grows by 71% in Q1 2024. California bill amends ruling that gutted value of solar for multi-meter properties. And more.

Total U.S. solar module manufacturing capacity grows by 71% in Q1 2024 According to the U.S. Solar Market Insight Q2 2024 report, solar module manufacturing production capacity increased by over 11 GW.

World’s largest solar plant goes online in China  China Green Development Group has switched on the 3.5 GW Midong solar project in Urumqi, China’s Xinjiang region. The project required an investment of CNY 15.45 billion ($2.13 billion).

U.S. commercial real estate to host VPP-connected flywheels and batteries U.S.-based technology provider Torus has agreed to supply nearly 26 MWh of energy storage for Gardner Group’s commercial real estate portfolio. The project will integrate battery and flywheel energy storage systems (BESS, FESS) with Torus’ proprietary energy management platform.

Solar panel import tariffs are affecting the industry by increasing prices by up to 286% Clean Energy Associates released a summary of the seven solar module trade policies and solar panel import tariffs currently in place, including AD/CVD rulings, Section 201/302, and the Uyghur Protection Act. These tariffs have significantly increased, or will increase, the cost of hardware imports into the United states – predominantly from China, but not exclusively – by 91% to 286%.

IEA urges countries to accelerate renewables deployment A new report from the International Energy Agency (IEA) suggests that the world could miss out on a target of 11,000 GW of global renewables capacity by the end of the decade, as agreed at COP28. It also predicts that solar will become the world’s largest source of installed renewable capacity, surpassing hydropower.

California bill amends ruling that gutted value of solar for multi-meter properties If approved, SB 1374 would give schools, farms, apartments and other multi-meter properties “the same treatment” as single-family homes in solar crediting and billing structures.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/07/sunrise-brief-solar-panel-import-tariffs-increasing-prices-by-up-to-286/feed/ 0 105008
California bill amends ruling that gutted value of solar for multi-meter properties https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/06/california-bill-amends-ruling-that-gutted-value-of-solar-for-multi-meter-properties/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/06/california-bill-amends-ruling-that-gutted-value-of-solar-for-multi-meter-properties/#respond Thu, 06 Jun 2024 20:02:18 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105034 If approved, SB 1374 would give schools, farms, apartments and other multi-meter properties “the same treatment” as single-family homes in solar crediting and billing structures.

California has made numerous cuts to solar incentives and programs in its state, including reductions in the valuation and crediting of exported solar generation, cuts to its emerging community solar program, and imposing a monthly fixed charge that erodes the potential savings brought on by rooftop solar.

However, the California legislature has recently moved forward a bill that would undo a decision that would negatively affect the value of rooftop solar for renters in multifamily housing, and for farms, and schools.

The decision sets hard limits on how much electricity produced by rooftop solar can be self-consumed by multi-meter properties. The policy effectively forces customers to first sell their solar production to the utility, and then buy it back at higher rates.

“It would force customers in multi-meter properties—such as renters, small farmers, schools, and colleges—to sell all of their generation to the utility at low rates and buy it back at full retail rates,” said the California Solar and Storage Association (CALSSA).

California’s Virtual Net Metering and Net Energy Metering Aggregation programs allow properties with multiple meters to install a single solar array for the entire property, sharing one system’s electricity and associated net metering credits with all customers and meters on the property. 

The decision would require multi-meter properties to sell solar to the grid at a low “avoided cost” rate and then purchased back at a full retail rate. This would be required even if the electricity generated on the school’s roof was used directly by the school.

A new bill, Senate Bill 1374, sponsored by Senator Josh Becker, would reverse the decision. The bill passed the Senate 28-7 and now awaits approval from the Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee.

“SB 1374 removes a burdensome barrier and restores the ability for customers to self-consume the energy they produce on their property,” Becker said in a statement. “This bill is simply a matter of fairness. Multiple-metered customers should get the same treatment as everyone else — not have to sell their power to the utility at low prices and immediately buy it back at much higher retail prices.”

The state’s three investor-owned utilities PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E oppose the decision. In a joint statement the three said Becker’s bill “subsidizes solar for all non-residential customers, not just schools.” However, public schools would essentially be performing energy arbitrage for the utility companies under their vision.

Utilities have justified cuts to rooftop solar programs based on an argument that non-solar customers subsidize those with solar. The utilities alleged the bill “is likely to trigger grid upgrades, which results in high cost for all, but for the benefit of only a few customers.” However. analysis from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has determined that non-residential solar programs have not caused a cost shift.

Supporters of Senate Bill 1374 say it would help schools with the electricity affordability crisis. Oakland Public Schools have seen their utility bill increase $1.5 million over the last year alone.

“Public schools have one general fund that everything comes out of: teachers’ salaries, textbooks, mental health counselors, utility bills-–it all comes out of the same bucket,” said Sam Davis, Oakland Unified School District board president. In previous years, we used solar energy to offset these rising costs and invest the savings in programs that improve educational equity. Restoring and protecting these incentives is critical to ensuring all students receive the education they need to thrive.”

Nearly 2,500 schools have installed solar in California according to Generation 180. Read about rooftop solar success stories for schools in the U.S. here.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/06/california-bill-amends-ruling-that-gutted-value-of-solar-for-multi-meter-properties/feed/ 0 105034
Solar panel import tariffs are affecting the industry by increasing prices by up to 286% https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/06/solar-panel-import-tariffs-are-affecting-the-industry-by-increasing-prices-by-up-to-286/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/06/solar-panel-import-tariffs-are-affecting-the-industry-by-increasing-prices-by-up-to-286/#comments Thu, 06 Jun 2024 18:16:41 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104980 Clean Energy Associates released a summary of the seven solar module trade policies and solar panel import tariffs currently in place, including AD/CVD rulings, Section 201/302, and the Uyghur Protection Act. These tariffs have significantly increased, or will increase, the cost of hardware imports into the United states - predominantly from China, but not exclusively - by 91% to 286%.

As the United States reassesses its shrinking manufacturing base relative to China’s expanding influence and considers the global geopolitical landscape, solar panel import tariffs continue to play a pivotal role in shaping the industry. Solar modules are now the world’s leading source of new energy, and international relations often hinge on energy politics. This is exemplified by the current war in Europe, which was precipitated by Russia using its gas resources to slow the continent’s response to its invasion of Ukraine, leading to a massive increase in the adoption of photovoltaics across the continent.

Since October 10, 2012, the Commerce Department, then under President Barack Obama, has subjected all solar modules containing key components from China to an import tariff. Now, in 2024, as the solar industry strives to fully scale and establish itself, the U.S. has imposed five import tariffs, one geographical import ban, and has also recently initiated an additional tariff case now under investigation.

Christian Roseland, an analyst at Clean Energy Associates, released a document titled “US Trade Policies That Affect Solar PV.” This document lists seven policies:

US customs, trade and commerce department import tariff policies table

2012

Starting from the oldest, the original Antidumping and Countervailing Duties (AD/CVD) case of 2012 was applied to all solar cells originating in China. According to a fact sheet from the U.S. International Trade Administration, the Commerce Department found that “Chinese producers/exporters have sold solar cells in the United States at dumping margins ranging from 18.32 to 249.96 percent. Commerce also determined that Chinese producers/exporters have received countervailable subsidies of 14.78 to 15.97 percent.”

Although Suntech and Trina were most publicly associated with these solar panel import tariffs, the ruling covered all solar cells from China, including 59 additional companies explicitly named in the document.

 Final dumping margins table comparing top Chinese Solar Energy exporters and producers
Source: U.S. Commerce Dept.

2014

While it didn’t technically affect solar cell prices, in 2014, the Obama administration charged “Five Chinese Military Hackers for Cyber Espionage Against U.S. Corporations and a Labor Organization for Commercial Advantage.” These charges stemmed from the theft of “thousands of files including information about SolarWorld’s cash flow, manufacturing metrics, production line information, costs, and privileged attorney-client communications relating to ongoing trade litigation, among other things.”

2015

In February 2015, a second pair of duties targeted solar modules assembled in China and solar cells from Taiwan. The solar module duty focused on Trina and was extended to include Jinko Solar. It applied to all companies assembling solar modules in China using solar cells from any manufacturing hub. It was determined that China had started to manufacture cells outside its borders, only to import them later for module assembly. The second ruling aimed to curtail Chinese companies that were specifically investing in the production of solar cells in Taiwan for subsequent reimportation into China.

The tariff rates were 26% for Trina, 78% for Jinko, with a standard 52% for a large number of companies. Companies not on the original list faced a nationwide tariff of 165%.

 Weighted average dumping margins table with 4 top Chinese Solar Energy exporters and producers
Source: US National Archives Federal Register

2018

Following lawsuits by Suniva, the Trump administration implemented two additional tariffs: Section 201 & Section 301, applying to solar modules and hundreds of other items, respectively. The Section 201 tariff imposed a 30% import tariff on all solar modules from all countries, decreasing 5% annually until its scheduled end. The Biden administration later extended this tariff.

Initially, the Section 201 tariff excluded bifacial solar modules, as no significant U.S. production existed. However, as the U.S. module manufacturing base began to scale, the Biden administration recently reinstated a 15% tariff on bifacial modules.

2022a

The Uighur Protection Act aimed to ban all materials coming from the Xinjang region of China, identified as originating from forced labor. This region is noted for its solar polysilicon production, facilitated by inexpensive coal-powered electricity. As a result, significant volumes of solar modules were blocked from entering the U.S. by Customs.

In response, many solar manufacturers began to shift their sourcing of solar polysilicon away from this region, including all products coming into the United States. To prove the origin of the product, the industry has started to develop supply chain verification techniques, and some Chinese solar manufacturers have initiated agreements with international polysilicon groups.

2022b (2012 – Part 2)

After a lawsuit was dismissed in 2021 due to anonymity concerns, Auxin Solar filed an AD/CVD lawsuit targeting Chinese manufacturers who had relocated solar cell and module production to Southeast Asia, claiming these actions violated the 2012 circumvention ruling. In winter 2022, the ruling confirmed circumvention by four companies, while another four major companies were found compliant.

Table showing subsidy percentages by Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam for crystalline solar cell and panel manufacturers
U.S. Commerce Dept.

The ruling specified that Chinese-origin solar cells would not be tariffed if at least three of six key subcomponents, including silver paste, aluminum frames, glass, backsheets, ethylene vinyl acetate sheets, and junction boxes, also originated outside of China.

President Biden paused the resultant tariffs for two years to foster the expansion of the U.S. solar industry, aligning with the goals of the inflation Reduction Act. The suspension was strategically planned to bolster the manufacturing and installation sectors of the solar industry during a critical growth period before any reductions in imports were enacted. Recently, Auxin challenged this decision by filing a lawsuit against the pause. This tariff suspension is scheduled to conclude on June 6, 2024.

2024a (2018 Part 2)

The current administration has extended and increased tariffs under the Section 301 ruling established in 2018, now covering solar cells, as well as batteries for cars and grid storage. The tariff on solar cells has risen from 25% to 50%, and battery cells have seen increases up to 25%. Today, importing solar cells from China, which cost between a few cents to a nickel per watt, would see a tariff increase from $0.0125/Wdc to $0.025/Wdc with this hike.

2024b – Pending Investigation

A petition filed by the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee, which includes First Solar, Qcells, Meyer Burger, REC Silicon, and others, claims that the U.S. “manufacturing renaissance” is threatened by heavily subsidized Chinese cells and modules. These are alleged to be in violation of antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) laws.

The petition advocates applying the logic of the 2012 and 2015 AD/CVD rulings, which contend that certain countries hosting solar cell and module assembly factories – Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam – are unfairly subsidizing those factories, affecting all crystalline solar cell and panel manufacturers in those countries.

Source: American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee

In their filing, the group says, “Although the Petitioner does not identify specific subsidy rates from the Subject Countries, the Petition alleges that solar cells and modules are imported and dumped in the U.S. market at the (above) margins.” The rates alleged are 70.35% for Thailand, 81.24% for Malaysia, 127.06% for Cambodia, and 271.45% for Vietnam.

How to apply solar panel import tariffs

Solar tariffs are collected by customs agents. While the buyer ultimately pays for the tariffs in the long run, the immediate financial responsibility depends on the import technique – EXW, FCA, DDP, etc. This determines who writes the check at the moment of import approval and who might be responsible if the amounts are incorrect or if evolving laws change the tariff amounts.

When calculating the AD/CVD and Section 201/301 tariffs, each tariff percentage is applied to the purchase price of the product. Among the four AD/CVD tariffs, a single charge is applied, but this only pertains to modules from specific regions. Conversely, both the Section 201 and 301 tariffs are imposed on all solar modules globally.

For example, if a solar module costs $0.10 per watt, then the Section 201 tariff at 15% would add $0.015 per watt, and the Section 301 tariff at 50% would add $0.05 per watt.

For a 2015 AD/CVD non-compliant solar module, the tariffs would vary significantly by manufacturer and country. For instance, when importing from China, tariffs are 26% for Trina products, 78% for Jinko, with a standard rate of 52% applying to a large number of companies. Non-listed companies would face a 165% tariff, leading to additional costs ranging from $0.026 to $0.165 per watt due to tariffs.

Should the 2024b tariff be applied as proposed, tariffs would increase costs significantly, adding $0.07035 per watt for modules assembled in Thailand up to $0.27145 per watt for those from Vietnam. However, none of these countries would have the Section 301 tariff applied, as that tariff only applies to products manufactured in China.

In total, a solar module initially costing a dime per watt could eventually cost between $0.191 and $0.38 per watt – an increase of 91% to 286%.

In comparison to the Inflation Reduction Act

Solar panel import tariffs are primarily intended to support the development of a new U.S.-based solar module manufacturing supply chain, which is financially backed by the Inflation Reduction Act. This act introduces a series of tax credits designed to bolster domestic manufacturers.

For solar modules, the credits are as follows:

  • Solar cells: 4 cents per direct current watt of capacity
  • Solar wafers: $12 per square meter
  • Solar grade polysilicon: $3 per kilogram
  • Polymeric backsheet: 40 cents per square meter
  • Solar modules: 7 cents per direct current watt of capacity

For inverters, the credit varies depending on the type and is applied per watt of alternating current:

  • Central inverter: 0.25 cents
  • Utility inverter: 1.5 cents
  • Commercial inverters: 2 cents
  • Residential inverters: 6.5 cents
  • Microinverters: 11 cents

Additionally, torque tubes for racking will receive a credit of $0.87 per kilogram, and structural fasteners will receive $2.28 per kilogram. Detailed information on these production credits is available starting on page 414 of the Inflation Reduction Act.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/06/solar-panel-import-tariffs-are-affecting-the-industry-by-increasing-prices-by-up-to-286/feed/ 1 104980
Total U.S. solar module manufacturing capacity grows by 71% in Q1 2024 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/06/total-u-s-solar-module-manufacturing-capacity-grows-by-71-in-q1-2024/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/06/total-u-s-solar-module-manufacturing-capacity-grows-by-71-in-q1-2024/#respond Thu, 06 Jun 2024 17:19:24 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=105010 According to the U.S. Solar Market Insight Q2 2024 report, solar module manufacturing production capacity increased by over 11 GW.

The  U.S. Solar Market Insight Q2 2024 report says 11 GW of new solar module manufacturing capacity came online in the United States during Q1 2024, the largest quarter of solar manufacturing growth in American history.

The report, released by the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and Wood Mackenzie, estimates that total U.S. solar module manufacturing capacity now exceeds 26 GW annually.

In addition to solar manufacturing, the U.S. is also quickly ramping up solar installations. With 11.8 GW of new solar capacity installed thus far in 2024, total capacity now stands at 200 GW in the United States. The utility-scale segment alone accounts for nearly 10 GW of the new capacity added.

The report shows that the U.S. added over 40 GW of new solar capacity last year, and Wood Mackenzie now projects that the U.S. is on target to achieve the same goal in 2024.

“This quarter proves that new federal investments in clean energy are revitalizing American manufacturing and strengthening our nation’s energy economy,” said SEIA president and CEO Abigail Ross Hopper. “Whether it’s a billion-dollar investment in a nearby solar project or a new manufacturing plant employing hundreds of local workers, the solar and storage industry is uplifting communities in every state across this country.”

The report points to Florida and Texas as leaders in new solar capacity in Q1. Florida installed 2.7 GW in Q1 and Texas 2.6 GW. California, historically a solar leader, falls into third place with 1.4 GW of new installs; however, it is notable that in 2023, Texas installed nearly 12 GW, while California was about 6.4 GW. New Mexico is another leading market with 686 MW installed in Q1, with Ohio following close behind at 546 MW. Bringing up the bottom is North Dakota, Alabama and Alaska.

“The U.S. solar industry continues to show strength in terms of deployments,” said Michelle Davis, head of global solar at Wood Mackenzie and lead author of the report. “At the same time, the solar industry faces a number of challenges to its continued growth including availability of labor, high voltage equipment constraints, and continued trade policy uncertainty.”

The residential solar segment has been hard hit by high interest rates and unsupportive state policies. California, where the highly controversial NEM 3.0 went into effect, experienced its worst quarter in two years. Overall the residential sector installed 1.3 GWdc in Q1, reflecting a 25% decline year-over-year and 18% quarter-over-quarter but going forward residential solar is expected to be steady.

Commercial solar showed 23% growth in 2023 and expected to grow by another 14% in 2024. This sector is somewhat buoyed by California projects that were submitted under NEM 2.0 still being in the interconnection queue.

Looking at community solar, installations resulted in 279 MWdc of new capacity in Q1, with New York topping the charts at 17% year-over-year in Q1 2024, making up 46% of national installed capacity.

Again, state policy changes in California are punching holes in a previously growing market. As a result of the CPUC’s vote on AB 2316, the report authors revised their five-year outlook for California and now expects just 200 MW rather than the 1.5 GW—an 87% decline. Overall the community solar market is expected to grow 4% in 2024, exceeding 1.3 GWdc of annual capacity.

Questions and challenges

With many unanswered questions about tariffs on imported solar modules and other components, the report contends that a tariff increase will not have a significant direct impact on the U.S. solar industry, given that the U.S. is importing less than 0.1% from China at the present time.

Moving forward, the report’s five-year outlooks expects the U.S. industry to install around 40 GWdc a year for the next five years. Trade policy uncertainty coupled with shortages in workers as well as high-voltage equipment, will keep overall growth in the single digits through 2029. The five year projection, however, is for U.S. solar capacity to grow to 438 GW by 2029.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/06/total-u-s-solar-module-manufacturing-capacity-grows-by-71-in-q1-2024/feed/ 0 105010
Building public trust around large-scale solar energy projects https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/05/building-public-trust-around-large-scale-solar-energy-projects/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/05/building-public-trust-around-large-scale-solar-energy-projects/#respond Wed, 05 Jun 2024 18:11:10 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104959 The Department of Energy awards $9.5 million to four projects intended to learn about best community engagement practices for solar siting and permitting.

The U.S. has a net-zero by 2050 goal, which means moving away from fossil fuel generated energy as fast as possible as much as 40% of all carbon dioxide pollution comes from fossil fuel power plants, according to the Department of Energy (DOE). The good news is that for the first time, solar accounted for over half of new electricity generation capacity added 2023 and, by 2050, solar is expected to be the largest source of generating capacity on the U.S. grid.

As the more large-scale solar projects seek approval in the U.S., the Department of Energy is concerned that measures are taken to gain public trust and understanding of the need for and scope of the projects. To that end, the DOE is investing $9.5 million in four new projects that support social science research that examines the ways that siting practices can influence public attitudes toward and permitting of large-scale solar facilities.

The award was one of four made by DOE’s Solar Energy Technologies office under their Solar Energy Evolution and Diffusion Studies 4 (SEEDS 4) program. The organizations receiving funding under the program include the Solar and Storage Industries Institute, Michigan State University, Princeton University, the and the University of Pennsylvania.

The Solar and Storage Industries Institute (S12) was awarded $2.5 million for a project that builds off the stakeholder-driven Uncommon Dialogue: Large-Scale U.S. Solar Development, convened by Stanford University, the Solar Energy Industries Associataion (SEIA) and The Nature Conservancy, and balances three imperatives in the development and deployment of large-scale solar projects: climate, conservation, and community.

In partnership with the Uncommon Dialogue working groups, the project team will identify the best ways to engage community, and these practices will be tested at large-scale solar project sites. The University of California, Santa Barbara and Lawrence Berkely National Labs will study how these practices shape local support for large-scale solar projects.

“We are incredibly excited to receive this award and thank the DOE for this opportunity to perform cutting-edge research on large-scale solar siting and permitting,” said David Gahl, executive director at SI2. “By testing stakeholder-developed community engagement practices at actual solar sites, we hope to yield new insights that improve outreach to host communities.”

Michigan State University was awarded $2.5 million for a project in which researchers will evaluate the potential to speed up large-scale solar siting and permitting processes while also reducing community burdens and improving procedural justice and energy equity. The project will study ten large-scale projects in four different regions of the country.

Princeton University was awarded $2 million for a project in which researchers will assess the potential for Community Benefit Agreements. These legal agreements between community groups and large-scale solar developers can deliver tangible benefits to communities, build credibility in solar projects and strengthen trust across stakeholder groups.

University of Pennsylvania researchers were awarded $2.5 million to evaluate how different siting practices shape community support for large-scale solar projects and how those dynamics differ across different types of communities.

Also read: Solar project developers face opposition from Joshua Tree conservationists

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/05/building-public-trust-around-large-scale-solar-energy-projects/feed/ 0 104959
Sunrise brief: A new federal transmission rule won’t help renewables projects anytime soon https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/05/sunrise-brief-a-new-federal-transmission-rule-wont-help-renewables-projects-anytime-soon/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/05/sunrise-brief-a-new-federal-transmission-rule-wont-help-renewables-projects-anytime-soon/#respond Wed, 05 Jun 2024 12:00:20 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104904 Also on the rise: The IRA effect on domestic supply chain. Solar carport to provide 100% electricity needs for Los Angeles Six Flags. And more.

Has the Inflation Reduction Act bolstered the U.S. solar supply chain?  Wood Mackenzie is tracking the capacity that manufacturers have announced will come online in the U.S.; however, three challenges remain including a balance of materials, pricing and tariffs.

RFP alert: CAISO and TID seek renewable energy and storage projects Using the Ascend Analytics Energy Exchange, Turlock Irrigation District announces a request for proposals to meet its California Renewable Portfolio Standards and reliability goals.

A new federal transmission rule won’t help renewables projects anytime soon Although promptly deploying grid-enhancing technologies and advanced conductors could speed interconnection in the short term, a new federal transmission rule will improve interconnection only once new transmission is built, said panelists on a webinar.

ABB launches smart panel for home energy management In partnership with Lumin, the company released an electric panel with software for controlling solar, batteries, EV chargers, and more.

Researchers build 24.4%-efficient perovskite solar cells with room temperature process Researchers from the U.S. and South Korea have developed a method to make high-quality perovskite films at room temperature. The film was tested in a conventional perovskite solar cell architecture and the result was a power conversion efficiency of exceeding 24%.

Startup uses agricultural waste to produce low-cost, safe batteries U.S.-based start-up SorbiForce uses no toxic products or metals in production of its batteries. It claims its systems are cheaper and safer than lithium-ion batteries and have near zero end-of-life waste.

Solar carport to provide 100% electricity needs for Los Angeles Six Flags  Recom Technologies was selected as the solar panel provider for the 12 MW solar carport.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/05/sunrise-brief-a-new-federal-transmission-rule-wont-help-renewables-projects-anytime-soon/feed/ 0 104904
A new federal transmission rule won’t help renewables projects anytime soon https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/04/a-new-federal-transmission-rule-wont-help-renewables-projects-anytime-soon/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/04/a-new-federal-transmission-rule-wont-help-renewables-projects-anytime-soon/#respond Tue, 04 Jun 2024 18:25:33 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104912 Although promptly deploying grid-enhancing technologies and advanced conductors could speed interconnection in the short term, a new federal transmission rule will improve interconnection only once new transmission is built, said panelists on a webinar.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/04/a-new-federal-transmission-rule-wont-help-renewables-projects-anytime-soon/feed/ 0 104912
Has the Inflation Reduction Act bolstered the U.S. solar supply chain? https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/04/has-the-inflation-reduction-act-bolstered-the-u-s-solar-supply-chain/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/04/has-the-inflation-reduction-act-bolstered-the-u-s-solar-supply-chain/#respond Tue, 04 Jun 2024 13:48:22 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104886 Wood Mackenzie is tracking the capacity that manufacturers have announced will come online in the U.S.; however, three challenges remain including a balance of materials, pricing and tariffs.

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 sets forth both demand and supply-side incentives to encourage solar manufacturing within the U.S., both in the form of production tax credits for manufacturers and investment tax credits for project developers using domestic content. While these incentives have driven a rush of investments on U.S. lands in from major global solar component providers, Wood Mackenzie takes a look at whether the IRA is paying off in terms of growing a supply chain that includes solar components such as wafers, cells, modules and more.

According to Michelle Davis, head of global solar at Wood Mackenzie, the IRA has successfully promoted domestic solar manufacturing investment. Wood Mac is looking at 144 GW of announced module manufacturing capacity, 71 GW of cell manufacturing capacity and 61 GW of wafer manufacturing capacity by 2027. Compare this to the 26 GW of module capacity we have today, along with no wafer or cell production.

But announced versus expected are two different things, and several challenges put the buildout at risk. Wood Mac predicts only about 45% of module capacity, 25% of cell capacity, and 5% of wafer capacity will come to fruition.

According to Davis, “Some investments will fall through and less experienced companies won’t have the expertise and wherewithal to execute on their plans”.

The first challenge, she notes, is seen in the discrepancy between the capacity of modules being produced in the U.S. compared to cells and wafer. As a result, the domestic industry will continue to rely on imports for these upstream materials.

While announced capacity of 71 GW of cell manufacturing and 61 GW of wafer manufacturing could come online by 2027, cell and wafer facilities are much more expensive and complex plants to build. Davis said that because the likelihood of success is lower than with module manufacturing plants, the U.S. solar industry will continue to rely on imported cells and wafers.

The second challenge, according to Davis, is that very few of the “other” solar components are made in the U.S. and this includes glass, backsheets, frames, junction boxes and more. As demand increases, capacity will grow—but it will take time.

One example is U.S. dependence on aluminum module frames, which are mostly imported from East and Southeast Asia, and the report notes that they are all made from carbon-intensive aluminum. A report produced by Wood Mackenzie and Origami Solar, a manufacturer of steel frames, says that if the U.S. solar industry switched from aluminum to recycled steel frames, it would no longer be dependent on foreign imports because “the  massive, well-established U.S. steel industry is positioned to easily meet the demand of domestic manufacturers with a more reliable, durable, less carbon-intensive, and readily available product”.

A third challenge is price. With overseas manufacturers expanding stockpiles, oversupply is causing steep price competition, according to Davis, and U.S. manufacturers are selling modules at a loss to compete.

[Also read Solar wafer prices continue to soften, complex international trade situation sparks concerns.]

In response to the price competition, the Department of Commerce initiated its investigation for alleged antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) infractions in Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, and Cambodia. Historically, tariffs have ranged as high as 50% to 250% of the cost of shipped goods. The International Trade Commission (ITC) must make a preliminary determination by June 10, 2024, on whether the domestic industry has suffered injury from import of dumped goods.

These issues and challenges will be discussed in the upcoming Wood Mackenzie’s Solar and Energy Storage Summit June 12 to 13 in San Francisco.

 

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/04/has-the-inflation-reduction-act-bolstered-the-u-s-solar-supply-chain/feed/ 0 104886
Sunrise brief: Fronius unveils residential string inverter for rooftop solar. https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/04/sunrise-brief-fronius-unveils-residential-string-inverter-for-rooftop-solar/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/04/sunrise-brief-fronius-unveils-residential-string-inverter-for-rooftop-solar/#respond Tue, 04 Jun 2024 12:11:26 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104841 Also on the rise: Vermont becomes first state with Climate Superfund Act. Solar project developers face opposition from Joshua Tree conservationists. And more.

PVRadar offers solar project risk assessments factoring in historical climate data  PVRadar Labs has expanded its software platform to include PV project risk assessment functionality, reportedly enabling more realistic performance estimates based on historical climate data.

JinkoSolar claims 33.24% efficiency for perovskite-silicon tandem solar cells JinkoSolar says it has achieved a 33.24% efficiency rating for its perovskite-silicon tandem solar cells, confirmed by the Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology under the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS).

Vermont becomes first state with Climate Superfund Act  The Vermont legislation intends to hold fossil fuel corporations responsible for climate change.

Fronius unveils residential string inverter for rooftop solar The Fronius Gen24 hybrid inverter comes to North America after success in Europe.

Solar project developers face opposition from Joshua Tree conservationists  The site of the Aratina Solar Center in Kern County, California, is home to western Joshua trees, and therefore the developer has to comply with the Western Joshua Tree Conservation Act that was enacted in July 2023. Incidental Take Permits authorize renewable energy developers to remove trees with an option to pay a standard mitigation fee rather than complete mitigation actions.

Texas to host 300 MW of geomechanical energy storage projects  Quidnet Energy, a provider of geomechanical energy storage (GES) technology, has joined hands with distributed energy resources developer Hunt Energy Network to deliver 300 MW of storage projects in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) grid operating region.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/04/sunrise-brief-fronius-unveils-residential-string-inverter-for-rooftop-solar/feed/ 0 104841
Solar project developers face opposition from Joshua Tree conservationists https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/03/solar-project-developers-face-opposition-from-joshua-tree-conservationists/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/03/solar-project-developers-face-opposition-from-joshua-tree-conservationists/#comments Mon, 03 Jun 2024 20:25:34 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104868 The site of the Aratina Solar Center in Kern County, California, is home to western Joshua trees, and therefore the developer has to comply with the Western Joshua Tree Conservation Act that was enacted in July 2023. Incidental Take Permits authorize renewable energy developers to remove trees with an option to pay a standard mitigation fee rather than complete mitigation actions.

A solar project that was unanimously approved by the Kern County, California Board of Supervisors in 2021 is coming under fire by some who oppose the cutting of western Joshua trees to make way for the Aratina solar project. An environmental review process is conducted prior to approval and before construction begins on any large-scale solar plant, including Aratina.

Aratina is a solar-plus-storage project with an intended generation capacity of up to 530 MW and 600 MW battery energy storage system. Once fully operational, it is expected to produce enough clean electricity to power 180,000 homes. The electricity generated by the Aratina Solar Center will be transmitted to utilities and community energy providers throughout California.

In addition to reducing 860,000 metric tons of carbon emissions every year, which is the annual equivalent to planting 14 million trees or removing 180,000 cars from the road, the project is expected to benefit the local community. Avantus has allocated over $135,000 toward programs and services in Boron and Desert Lake. It is also is expected to generate over $30 million in local tax revenue over the solar center’s lifetime that can go toward local services like schools, public safety, and street services. During construction, Aratina is expected to create approximately 570 construction jobs paying between $31 and $75 an hour.

To receive approval to develop the project located in the Boron and Desert Lake area of eastern Kern County, California, Avantus, the developer produced an Environmental Impact Report, as required prior to beginning construction. The company held public forums as part of the County review, during which some local residents raised concerns about visibility of the plant, and the developer altered its plans, stating that it “listened to the concerns and have incorporated them into a revised design that increases project setbacks from residential areas by up to a half-mile (almost nine football fields)”.

The revised site design, referred to as Aratina 2.0 by Kern County, increases project setbacks from Boron and Desert Lake’s residential areas. The company said the raised bed railroad that runs by the location and vegetation alongside the road will also reduce visibility of the project.

Because the site of the Aratina plant is home to western Joshua trees, the developer has to comply with the Western Joshua Tree Conservation Act (WJTCA), a California Law that was enacted in July 2023. Incidental Take Permits of the WJTCA authorize renewable energy developers to take western Joshua trees with an option to pay a standard mitigation fee rather than complete mitigation actions. Under the act, the fees collected are deposited into the Western Joshua Tree Conservation Fund for the purposes of acquiring, conserving and managing western Joshua tree conservation lands and completing other activities to conserve the tree.

To meet these requirements, Avantus hired qualified biologists, approved by the California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW), to a complete count of all western Joshua trees within the site and they will provide the CDFW with a complete Tree Census report. As part of the mitigation requirement in the WJTCA, Avantus must pay a mitigation fee of $10,521.95 per acre to be mitigated to the Western Joshua Tree Mitigation Fund. In addition, prior to removing any western Joshua tree or engaging in groundbreaking activities, the developer was required to contribute $10,000 to cover the account fees and the cost of retaining a land acquisition specialist to assist the department in locating, acquiring and conserving the mitigation lands.

According to Avantus, the process of selective clearing of vegetation, including Joshua Trees and large natural obstacles, will soon begin. The removal has been approved by Kern County and the CDFW, with all impacts such as noise and traffic minimized throughout.

Going beyond the requests of local residents and requirements of the WJTJCA, Avantus purchased the grazing rights on 215,000 acres of federal land in Kern County and created the Onyx Conservation Project. The contiguous land area is seven times larger than the city of San Francisco and considered among the largest mitigation projects in the nation.

The habitat is home to 20 sensitive wildlife species including the California condor, Mojave Desert tortoise, American badger, Mohave ground squirrel and golden eagles. It is also estimated to include more than 80,000 acres of western Joshua tree habitat, including 3,000 acres of dense woodland. This conservation effort will help sustain the health and diversity of the desert ecosystem, which is underlaid by designated Wilderness Areas, Desert National Conservation Lands, and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern. All 215,000 acres will also be open for public recreational use, including hiking and camping.

Avantus will also invest millions of additional dollars for habitat enhancements across Onyx to jumpstart restoration for desert plants and wildlife species.

The CDFW is cognizant of how renewable energy development is necessary in the effort to combat climate change, and endorses such protective measures.

“Our Department is committed to the conservation, protection and restoration of the Golden State’s habitat, and this groundbreaking state and federal public-private partnership provides a roadmap for how renewable energy can continue to combat climate change while also providing landscape-level ecosystem benefits to native plants and wildlife,” said CDFW regional manager, Julie Vance. “By purchasing and permanently retiring the grazing rights, Avantus is assuring this rich, vibrant land is preserved and its inhabitants can flourish.”

Avantus, formerly 8Minute Energy, is a leading solar and energy storage provider and is on track to provide more than half of California’s utility-scale solar and storage demand over the next decade. Aware of the impact that solar projects can have on land, Avantus works closely with wildlife agencies and environmental organizations safeguard species throughout all stages of a project’s life. Avantus reports that its past projects have received support from groups including the Sierra Club, Audubon California, Defenders of Wildlife, and the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Why large-scale solar?

Climate change threatens our nation and planet, as evidenced by the increasing number of extreme weather events. The U.S. has a net-zero by 2050 goal, which means moving away from fossil fuel generated energy as fast as possible as much as 40% of all carbon dioxide pollution comes from fossil fuel power plants, according to the Department of Energy.

The good news is that for the first time, solar accounted for over half of new electricity generation capacity added 2023 and, by 2050, solar is expected to be the largest source of generating capacity on the U.S. grid.

According to data from the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and Wood Mackenzie, the U.S. has officially exceeded five million solar installations, marking a milestone that comes just eight years after the U.S. reached one million installations in 2016.SEIA forecasts that solar installations in the U.S. will double to 10 million by 2030 and triple to 15 million by 2034.

While the number of installations in itself is impressive, cumulatively they are making a serious cut to carbon emissions. SEIA estimates that the installations displace 198 million metric tons of CO2 every year. This reduction is the equivalent to 22 billion gallons of gas, or enough gas to travel to the sun and back nearly 3,000 times in a traditional ICE vehicle. Overall, SEIA calculates that the current solar capacity in the U.S. offsets the emissions of 12 million Americans, which is greater than the population of New York City and Los Angeles combined.

With PV expected to triple in the United States by 2028, to reach an estimated 380 GW of solar capacity, according to the SEIA and analysts at Wood Mackenzie, sharing facts early on is important. Not only is it important to seek input from area residents—modifying plans when necessary—but going above and beyond permitting requirements to mitigate potential environmental damage is becoming more common among large-scale developers in the U.S.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/03/solar-project-developers-face-opposition-from-joshua-tree-conservationists/feed/ 5 104868
Vermont becomes first state with Climate Superfund Act https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/03/vermont-becomes-first-state-with-climate-superfund-act/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/03/vermont-becomes-first-state-with-climate-superfund-act/#respond Mon, 03 Jun 2024 15:31:48 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104844 The Vermont legislation intends to hold fossil fuel corporations responsible for climate change.

The Climate Superfund Act (S.259) was signed into law into law with a Senate voted of 26-3 and a House vote of 106 of the 150 members in favor. However, it was passed without a signature or a veto from Republican governor, Phil Scott.

The Act, modeled on the federal EPA Superfund program, requires the fossil fuel companies who produced more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions from 1995 to 2024 to contribute to the Climate Superfund Cost Recovery Program Fund.

“With the enactment of the Climate Superfund Act, we are entering a new era in the effort to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages they have caused,” said Elena Mihaly, vice president of Conservation Law Foundation Vermont. “No longer are we reliant on litigants. Finally, the legislative branch of government is saying it’s time to make the world’s biggest polluters pay a fair share of the cleanup costs.

The Climate Superfund Cost Recovery Program Fund will be administered by the Secretary of Natural Resources to provide funding for climate change adaptation projects in Vermont.  Monies from the Fund will go toward “climate change adaptation projects” that will be implemented according to the State Hazard Mitigation Plan.

The fossil fuel companies will be expected to begin payments of at least 20% of the total cost recovery demand no later than six months following the issuance of the cost recovery demand, followed by annual payments of up to 10% of that demand.

“Vermont’s citizen legislators really stepped up on this bill,” said Lauren Hierl, executive director of Vermont Conservation Voters and a Montpelier city councilor. “Without the Climate Superfund, the costs of climate change falls entirely on taxpayers – and that’s not fair. Now, there’s finally a law in place to require the corporations that caused the damage to pay, too.”

The law will likely be challenged by the fossil fuel industry. In a letter to the Vermont House Judiciary and Environment and Energy Committees the American Petroleum Institute said it “believes S.259 is bad public policy and may be unconstitutional”. The Institute thinks the bill is imposing charges for activities that were legal, and it says it’s “holding companies responsible for the actions of society at large”.

“We know that Big Oil will fight this in the courts,” said Representative Martin LaLonde (South Burlington), chair of the House Judiciary Committee, “But, as an attorney myself, and having worked closely with many legal scholars in shaping the bill, I believe we have a solid legal case. Most importantly, the stakes are too high – and the costs too steep for Vermonters – to release corporations that caused the mess from their obligation to help clean it up.”

Last summer Vermont felt the full effects of climate change when record-breaking rainfall washed out roads and caused flooding in many part of the state. President Biden declared a State of Emergency when the storms caused what Governor Scott referred to as “historic and catastrophic” flooding.

“For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption without being required to do a thing to put out the fire,” said Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group (VPIRG). “Finally, maybe for the first time anywhere, Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.”

The bill received broad support in addition to the legislators who voted in favor. Vermont Public Interest Research Group, Vermont Natural Resources Council, the Conservation Law Foundation and the Sierra Club are among the many supporters of the bill.

“For decades, the oil industry has profited while their products and practices continue to cause societal harm in the forms of global climate change, public health hazards, and environmental degradation,” said Luke Miller, Vermont Sierra Club Executive Committee Member. “The Climate Superfund bill seeks to make Big Oil companies acknowledge and compensate the public for the damages they have caused over the years.”

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/03/vermont-becomes-first-state-with-climate-superfund-act/feed/ 0 104844
Sunrise brief: ‘Misguided’ CPUC vote may derail California community solar https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/03/sunrise-brief-6/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/03/sunrise-brief-6/#respond Mon, 03 Jun 2024 11:49:00 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104829 Also on the rise: Are false pretenses driving solar cell tariff case? Long-duration energy storage poised to outcompete lithium-ion batteries. And more.

CPUC vote expected to keep California community solar from reaching its full potential Coalition for Community Solar Access says the 3-1 vote ignored the will of the California Legislature and the broad coalition of ratepayer, equity, environmental, labor, agricultural, and business groups who have demanded a functional community solar program for more than a decade.

Alliant Energy completes 200 MW solar project in Wisconsin  The project is part of a multi-phase buildout of 12 solar projects totaling over 1 GW.

Long-duration energy storage poised to outcompete lithium-ion batteries While most long-duration energy storage (LDES) technologies are still early-stage and costly compared to lithium-ion batteries, some have already or are set to achieve lower costs for longer durations, finds BloombergNEF.

Solar wafer prices continue to soften, complex international trade situation sparks concerns  In a weekly update for pv magazine, OPIS, a Dow Jones company, provides a quick look at the main price trends in the global PV industry.

Gulf heat dome and polar jet stream shape solar outcomes in May In a weekly update for pv magazine, Solcast, a DNV company, reports that a strong polar jet stream and a record-breaking heat dome in May resulted in a stark contrast in irradiance patterns across North America. The western and central USA, along with Mexico, experienced higher than normal irradiance, while the Gulf and East Coast regions faced lower irradiance.

TCL Zhonghuan reveals plans to acquire majority stake in Maxeon Chinese wafer manufacturer TCL Zhonghuan says it wants to invest around $197.5 million to increase its stake in Maxeon from 22.39% to at least 50.1%. A Maxeon spokesperson told pv magazine that the plan would place the company in a solid financial position.

Are false pretenses driving solar cell tariff case? Global manufacturer Canadian Solar challenges prevailing support for tariffs among solar manufacturers, questions the accuracy of capacity estimations, and adverse financial effects.

 

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/06/03/sunrise-brief-6/feed/ 0 104829
In case you missed it: Five big solar stories in the news this week https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/31/in-case-you-missed-it-five-big-solar-stories-in-the-news-this-week/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/31/in-case-you-missed-it-five-big-solar-stories-in-the-news-this-week/#respond Fri, 31 May 2024 22:00:02 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104806 pv magazine USA spotlights news of the past week including market trends, project updates, policy changes and more.]]> pv magazine USA spotlights news of the past week including market trends, project updates, policy changes and more.

California Public Utilities Commission ‘misguided’ vote may derail state’s community solar potential Coalition for Community Solar Access says the 3-1 vote ignored the will of the California Legislature and the broad coalition of ratepayer, equity, environmental, labor, agricultural, and business groups who have demanded a functional community solar program for more than a decade.

REC introduces 640 W commercial solar panel The new product contains heterojunction cell technology (HJT) with up to 22.5% efficiency.

Cowboy Solar, largest solar project in Wyoming moves forward The $1.2 billion project will be built by Enbridge, with 771 MW expected to be fully operational by 2027.

Battery energy storage tariffs tripled; domestic content rules updated Breaking down U.S. market impacts on energy storage from recent policy changes with insights from Clean Energy Associates.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/31/in-case-you-missed-it-five-big-solar-stories-in-the-news-this-week/feed/ 0 104806
Are false pretenses driving solar cell tariff case? https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/31/are-false-pretenses-driving-solar-cell-tariff-case/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/31/are-false-pretenses-driving-solar-cell-tariff-case/#respond Fri, 31 May 2024 13:45:07 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104785 Global manufacturer Canadian Solar challenges prevailing support for tariffs among solar manufacturers, questions the accuracy of capacity estimations, and adverse financial effects.

Solar import tariffs aim to level the playing field by addressing the market price disparities of solar power hardware originating from China, while supporting domestic manufacturers. This strategy is part of the United States government’s broader efforts to protect national security and combat climate change.

Recently, these tariffs have ranged from symbolic warning shots to upward price adjustments that might increase the cost of solar modules and energy storage. Additional looming tariffs on solar panels, aluminum, steel, and other materials could further escalate industry costs.

Canadian Solar is a global company whose products bear multiple import tariffs. As well, in response to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), Canadian Solar plans to begin manufacturing solar cells in Indiana and assembling modules in Texas.

During a case initiated by the global Hanwha Q Cell at the U.S. International Trade Commission, Jonathan Stoel, a partner at Hogan Lovells LLP and counsel for Canadian Solar’s U.S. Module Manufacturing Corporation, made a statement they also provided to pv magazine USA. He argued that the case was “brought entirely on false pretenses and based on fundamentally erroneous predicates.”

Stoel outlined the perceived inaccuracies:

  • The assertion by other petitioners that 36 GW of solar panels are at stake in this ruling is a significant overestimation, likely intentional.
  • The claim that the majority of the solar manufacturing industry supports the tariffs is misleading. In reality, only three companies – major one though – have advocated for the tariffs. It was noted that most companies planning to assemble solar panels in the U.S., due to the IRA incentives, oppose the import tariffs on solar cells because they rely on importing these components.
  • Solar cells and solar modules are distinct technologies. Stoel cited evidence that Hanwha’s Q Cell operates two separate facilities for manufacturing solar cells, while also importing solar modules. It is important to note, as pv magazine USA adds, that the nation’s largest solar manufacturer, First Solar, integrates the production of solar cells and modules in a single process. However, this case specifically addresses crystalline solar cells, which First Solar does not produce.
  • Stoel emphasized that Hanwha’s expansion in Georgia was primarily motivated by government incentives, which is the very thing that this case seems to push back against.

In response to the points raised, Stoel urged the court to recognize several key aspects of the case: (1) it was filed on dubious grounds; (2) major manufacturers, not a majority, are opposed to imports; (3) modules and cells are distinct products; (4) the import volumes are far less significant than suggested and have not caused material harm; (5) adverse price effects have not been observed; (6) the court should consider the financial health and growth of the industry, spurred by incentives introduced by the IRA; (7) many US companies involved, including Hanwha’s Q Cell which initiated the case, have substantial international connections.

Despite the claims regarding the absence of adverse price effects, the cost of solar cells and modules in the United States has dramatically decreased. This reduction is due to a collapse in Chinese polysilicon pricing and a rapid increase in manufacturing capacity. Since even Chinese manufacturers, such as Longi, have acknowledged that this surge in capacity is negatively affecting their business, it can be fairly inferred that competing companies might perceive these developments as disadvantageous.

Ultimately, while the tariffs are presented as protective measures for domestic industries, their effectiveness is debatable. The global dynamics of the solar market and strategic responses by manufacturers suggest that these measures might serve more as diplomatic signaling than impactful economic barriers. Historically speaking, as noted in the above chart, tariffs alone haven’t shown to grow the U.S. solar manufacturing base – however – the IRA did.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/31/are-false-pretenses-driving-solar-cell-tariff-case/feed/ 0 104785
CPUC vote expected to keep California community solar from reaching its full potential https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/31/cpuc-vote-expected-to-keep-california-community-solar-from-reaching-its-full-potential/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/31/cpuc-vote-expected-to-keep-california-community-solar-from-reaching-its-full-potential/#respond Fri, 31 May 2024 12:40:54 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104790 Coalition for Community Solar Access says the 3-1 vote ignored the will of the California Legislature and the broad coalition of ratepayer, equity, environmental, labor, agricultural, and business groups who have demanded a functional community solar program for more than a decade.

As expected, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) voted on changes to its utility-backed community solar program despite strong opposition from industry groups, community solar developers and even Assemblymember Chris Ward who introduced the original version of the bill (AB 2316).

Community solar enables small businesses and residents who are renters or who otherwise cannot put solar on their roof to subscribe to a portion of an off-site solar facility, receiving a utility bill credit for the power it generates. In California, approximately 45% of California households are renters who don’t own their roofs and, therefore, can’t install a solar system.

The Community Renewable Energy Act (AB 2316) put forth by Assemblymember Ward was sponsored by the Coalition for Community Solar Access (CCSA), and supported by the Solar Industries Energy Association, GRID Alternatives, Vote Solar, the Sierra Club, and more. Notably, investor-owned utilities, which serve over 75% of the electricity usage in the state, opposed the bill.

Riding on the tail of the CPUC’s net metering change, which dealt a serious blow to the residential solar industry, developers and other industry experts expect this new legislation will stall the buildout of community solar in California.

California was previously the leading state in solar energy; however, the tide is turning. Aaron Halimi, founder and president of Renewable Properties, a community solar developer, said that this recent decision by the CPUC will prevent California from being a leader in community solar. An increasing number of states are implementing pro-active community solar policies just as the market is starting take off.

Calling the new rules a “misguided decision”, Halimi said it’s unlikely the industry will invest in building community solar and energy storage projects in California.

“The CPUC’s decision primarily benefits the financial interests of utilities and does not support the State’s climate goals or the aim of reducing electric bills for low-income Californians, which was the purpose of AB 2316,” said Halimi.

Derek Chernow, Western regional director for the Coalition for Community Solar Access (CCSA) released a statement saying that the ruling “ignored the will of the California Legislature and the broad coalition of ratepayer, equity, environmental, labor, agricultural, and business groups who have demanded a functional community solar program for more than a decade”.

The legislation passed with a 3-1 vote, and CCSA thanked the lone dissenter, Commissioner Darcie Houck, for her vote and remarks for how this Decision will fail to reach community solar’s full potential.

The CCSA characterized the CPUC’s choice to accept the utilities’ proposal as doubling down on failed programs that “have not — and will not — establish a viable community solar market that would provide affordable energy to Californians that need relief the most”.

“It’s also further evidence that California’s utilities are doing everything they can to stifle distributed energy generation in order to tighten their grip on the state’s electricity grid. The vote solidifies California’s place near the bottom of community solar markets nationwide, ceding leadership to other states to truly democratize solar energy and fulfill national energy equity goals,” said CCSA.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/31/cpuc-vote-expected-to-keep-california-community-solar-from-reaching-its-full-potential/feed/ 0 104790
CPUC’s revised proposed decision could decimate California’s community solar market https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/29/cpucs-revised-proposed-decision-could-decimate-californias-community-solar-market/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/29/cpucs-revised-proposed-decision-could-decimate-californias-community-solar-market/#respond Wed, 29 May 2024 19:37:12 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104722 Just as an increasing number of states are implementing pro-active community solar policies, the California Public Utilities Commission is set to vote on a revised proposed decision that fails to seize on the opportunity to create a vibrant market, according to the Coalition for Community Solar Access.

The Community Renewable Energy Act (AB 2316) was sponsored by the Coalition for Community Solar Access (CCSA), and supported by the Solar Industries Energy Association, GRID Alternatives, Vote Solar, the Sierra Club, and more. However, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) opposed the bill.

The CPUC asserted in its proposed decision that the Net Value Billing Tariff (NVBT) outlined in the Community Renewable Energy Act “conflicts with federal law and does not meet the requirements” of the bill, which CCSA has noted is erroneous.

In comments filed in March by CCSA, it characterized the original proposed decision as misguided and misinformed, and determined it will not result in the development of community solar projects as envisioned by the legislature with the enactment of AB 2316.

Now the CPUC has revised its proposed decision and in it concedes that it needs guidance as to what a successful community solar program looks like:

…the record of this proceeding contains no details on what would be considered a successful community renewable energy program. Accordingly, the workshop with parties to discuss the objectives, methodology, and metrics for the evaluations of the community renewable energy program will include a discussion of what a successful community renewable energy program would look like, including metrics for success and a megawatt baseline expectation for the community renewable energy program.

This revised proposed decision says it’s beneficial to ratepayers to layer a customer subscription model and a non-ratepayer-funded adder on standard supply-side tariffs. This “revised” proposed decision still intends to rely on one-time funds from the EPA’s Solar for All program as a subsidy. The CCSA warns against subsidizing “an unworkable program” instead leveraging private capital “to serve hundreds of thousands of income-qualified customers and small businesses”.

Furthermore, the revised proposed decision gives no details such as a method for dispersing external funding to the projects and participating customers, reporting requirements, the process for participating, eligible tariffs, cost recovery mechanisms, and more.

According to the CCSA, CPUC is moving nothing forward and instead, “doubles down on supporting the broken proposal from the state’s utilities and would make California’s community solar program dead on arrival. It will not result in the development of new projects as envisioned by AB 2316 and will continue to leave California with no functional community solar program.”

The CCSA emphasizes the value that community solar can bring to California’s grid and help the state achieve both clean energy and equity objectives. Moving forward with the revised proposed decision, CCSA contends, would mean ignoring the many groups from the legislature to a broad coalition of ratepayers and other groups who seek a functional community solar program.

An increasing number of states are implementing pro-active community solar policies just as the market is starting take off. While installations of community solar contracted in 2022, Wood Mackenzie forecasts the U.S. community solar market to grow 118% over the next five years, with at least 6 GW expected to come online in existing markets between 2023 to 2027.

“California should be seizing this once-in-a-generation opportunity to create a vibrant market. We urge the CPUC to slow down and take the additional time necessary to get this important decision right,” said Derek Chernow, Western regional director for the CCSA.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/29/cpucs-revised-proposed-decision-could-decimate-californias-community-solar-market/feed/ 0 104722
Technology-neutral proposed tax credit called ‘game-changing policy’ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/29/technology-neutral-proposed-tax-credit-called-game-changing-policy/ https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/29/technology-neutral-proposed-tax-credit-called-game-changing-policy/#respond Wed, 29 May 2024 15:22:36 +0000 https://pv-magazine-usa.com/?p=104714 The U.S. Treasury Department has issued further proposed guidance on the IRA, detailing a path to support a broad array of technologies--including solar-- with tax credits, and clarifying many additional tax-related items in its latest guidance.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released proposed guidance to sunset the existing Investment Tax Credit (section 45) and Production Tax Credit (section 48) of the Inflation Reduction Act. This transition will consolidate all clean energy generation projects, including wind and solar, into the technology-neutral Clean Electricity Production Credit (section 45Y) and Clean Electricity Investment Credit (section 48E). These new tax credit sections will be applied to all projects placed in service after December 31, 2024.

In a press release, the IRS stated that the purpose of this new structure was to create a consistent framework for all clean energy technologies:

The technologies recognized in today’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) include wind, solar, hydropower, marine and hydrokinetic, nuclear fission and fusion, geothermal, and certain types of waste energy recovery property (WERP). The proposed guidance also clarifies how energy storage technologies would qualify for the Clean Electricity Investment Credit.

The document allows for technologies that may have aspects of their lifecycles that depend on fossil fuels; however, the IRS states these products must include a lifecycle greenhouse gas analysis and demonstrate net-zero emissions.

According to the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE), the tax credits are projected to “lower the average annual electric bill by $29.74 per household by 2030, and $42.95 by 2035.”

Called a “game-changing policy” by Ray Long, President and CEO of ACORE,  he said, “The tax credit increases American energy security and reliability by deploying new clean electric generation from wind, solar, battery storage, and other zero-carbon technologies. Analysis has shown that by 2035, clean energy capacity will increase by up to 50%.”

The IRS noted that the NPRM also outlines how to apply tax credits to interconnection costs for projects smaller than 5 MWac. These costs, incurred by solar projects to upgrade local transmission and distribution networks, are now covered under Section 48 of the Investment Tax Credit, which the IRA modified to include qualified interconnection costs.

Further cost structures are also detailed, for instance, the IRS notes that qualifying facilities need roads – and thus, the cost of roads is covered under tax credit considerations.

Proposed §1.45Y-2(b)(3)(iii) would provide that roads that are an integral part of a qualified facility are those roads integral to the intended function of the qualified facility, such as onsite roads that are used to operate and maintain the qualified facility. Proposed §1.45Y–2(b)(3)(iii) would also clarify that roads used primarily for access to the site, or roads used primarily for employee or visitor vehicles, are not integral to the intended function of the qualified facility and thus are not an integral part of a qualified facility.

]]>
https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/05/29/technology-neutral-proposed-tax-credit-called-game-changing-policy/feed/ 0 104714